Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Joe Marino The draft network QB scoring and write ups


 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

His scale is either wrong or he's grading WAY too hard.  According to his scale Wilson and Fields are not top 10 picks and Trey Lance is a 2nd rounder.  WRONG.

No its completely right, everyone is just blinded by the need for QB.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Supply and demand. 5 QBs considered to be 1st round this year because there are a dozen teams needing one. In a typical year there's probably only 2 or 3 going in round 1. 

So why waste a top ten pick on a should be 2nd rounder

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

No its completely right, everyone is just blinded by the need for QB.  

Wilson is just as good as Kyler Murray coming out. Zach Wilson is a top 5 player in this draft. It is ridiculous to come to any other conclusion IMO 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NFL brought this problem on themselves.  They've continued to emphasis offense over defense, and every offense starts with the QB.  It was much easier in the past to compete with an "average" QB, but you now need a "good" QB just to compete week in week out.  The college game isn't preparing it's QB's for the NFL properly because of all the vastly simplified one read systems.

One day we'll see a shift, I hope.  I'd like to see teams at least have a chance without that super high level QB, mostly because there are so few of them.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, BrianS said:

The NFL brought this problem on themselves.  They've continued to emphasis offense over defense, and every offense starts with the QB.  It was much easier in the past to compete with an "average" QB, but you now need a "good" QB just to compete week in week out.  The college game isn't preparing it's QB's for the NFL properly because of all the vastly simplified one read systems.

One day we'll see a shift, I hope.  I'd like to see teams at least have a chance without that super high level QB, mostly because there are so few of them.

 

I would love for there to be a shift back to more defense and running game but with the TV ratings the way they are for the NFL, don't expect it any time soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 45catfan said:

His scale is either wrong or he's grading WAY too hard.  According to his scale Wilson and Fields are not top 10 picks and Trey Lance is a 2nd rounder.  WRONG.

It’s because of the risk/reward IMO. He has the potential to be the best of the group, but could also struggle against better competition. Because if the importance of the position I think he is worth a first round pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't get the Hunter hate. Just imagine his ceiling if he stopped trying to be this 2way freak and focused on one side of the ball 
    • 100%.  You have to play the cards that are dealt.  Not the cards you wish were dealt.
    • I'd say its definitely going to be addressed this off-season.  We went into the last draft with a roster of RBs including:  Chubba, Blackshear, and Miles Sanders. We picked Jonathan Brooks in the second and still signed Rashaad Penny afterwards.  Fast forward....One turned into a top 10 back, 1 is injured/out for most if not all the '25 season, 1 retired, 1 will either take a huge paycut or be cut, and the last is a restricted free agent. We brought in Mike Boone as well. Add him to the free agent list also.  We need a physical option.    Which qualifies:  Ashton Jeanty(Boise St): Overall ranked Top 10. Almost 2k yards after contact, 28 tds. Would take our first rounder. My money would be on an NFC East team selecting him. (97.2 PFF run grade) - 121 forced missed tackles.  Omarion Hampton(UNC): Ranked everywhere from 20 - 59 overall. Consensus #2 back after Jeanty. He'll be a second rounder. 1,222 Yards after contact w/ 15 tds.  (90.5 PFF run grade) - 72 forced missed Tackles Kaleb Johnson(Iowa): Ranked from 38 - 69 depending on which media outlet you prefer but generally #3. 2nd/3rd possibly. 1,060 Yards after contact w/ 21 tds.(86.7 PFF run grade)- 66 forced missed tackles Cam Skattebo: Ranked from the 50's - 104. Every mock I do he ends up BPA at some point. 969 Yards after contact w/ 17 tds(92 PFF Run Grade). Probably the best receiving back of the group. 81 forced missed tackles.  If the '24 and '25 draft classes were combined, IMO the rankings would be, in order: Jeanty, Hampton, Brooks, Johnson, Skattebo. I wouldn't take one high but I'd take one for Chubba and Brooks insurance. 
×
×
  • Create New...