Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

All in for Dak


FuFuLamePoo
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, ImaginaryKev said:

Yall are being pedantic with me saying it was perfect which us reasonable. He's historically had a great offensive line and running game and when they gave him elite skill guys he lit up the league. But he's also not as good as the top guys in the league and yall know it, which i understand bc you're starving for a QB. Hea had the benefit  of playing there with that stability his entire career and yes he's been good but c'mon now. Don't oversell his abilities bc we in bad shape. 

I have to agree with this. Dak is not worth the type of contract he is going to receive. This is Kirk Cousins all over again. If we cant get Watson, lets see who we can draft. I know Teddy was bad but not bad enough to put Dak on some sort of pedestal. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ImaginaryKev said:

Yall are being pedantic with me saying it was perfect which us reasonable. He's historically had a great offensive line and running game and when they gave him elite skill guys he lit up the league. But he's also not as good as the top guys in the league and yall know it, which i understand bc you're starving for a QB. Hea had the benefit  of playing there with that stability his entire career and yes he's been good but c'mon now. Don't oversell his abilities bc we in bad shape. 

No, he's not a top tier QB, but he's in that next tier and that next tier is plenty good enough to win a SB. He's only going to be available if the Cowboys trade for Wilson which is an extreme long shot. But in that scenario, he's going to be able to be signed as a FA and we'd still have all our draft assets and could shift gears toward LT or CB at #8, or a trade down if one of the QBs slip. We have elite weapons, we just need OL help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

No, he's not a top tier QB, but he's in that next tier and that next tier is plenty good enough to win a SB. He's only going to be available if the Cowboys trade for Wilson which is an extreme long shot. But in that scenario, he's going to be able to be signed as a FA and we'd still have all our draft assets and could shift gears toward LT or CB at #8, or a trade down if one of the QBs slip. We have elite weapons, we just need OL help.

This still feels like settling for the next best guy bc we're starving. Deshaun is a special case bc he's elite 25 and an INSANE moneymaker on our team. But we shouldn't be trading draft picks and taking on a big contract unless it's an elite guy. Not when our roster is what it is and we can draft one of four great prospects this year and let them grow in OUR system. That's my thing at least. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ImaginaryKev said:

This still feels like settling for the next best guy bc we're starving. Deshaun is a special case bc he's elite 25 and an INSANE moneymaker on our team. But we shouldn't be trading draft picks and taking on a big contract unless it's an elite guy. Not when our roster is what it is and we can draft one of four great prospects this year and let them grow in OUR system. That's my thing at least. 

There are only 3-5 true top tier QBs in the league at any given time. Is everyone else "settling"? If the Cowboys trade for Wilson (which is the only way Dak would be available), they're gonna have to let Dak walk. They can't afford to trade for Wilson AND do a tag and trade on Dak. You wouldn't have to trade anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

There are only 3-5 true top tier QBs in the league at any given time. Is everyone else "settling"? If the Cowboys trade for Wilson (which is the only way Dak would be available), they're gonna have to let Dak walk. They can't afford to trade for Wilson AND do a tag and trade on Dak. You wouldn't have to trade anything.

Don't put words in my mouth about everyone being settling lol

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Richard Sherman got dog piled for basically saying he didn't stand out as a WR prospect but looked elite as a CB prospect. A few months ago you could find other players commenting on his limited route tree and raw route running but the search algorithms are flooded with love affair right now. The guy is the best CB prospect in years and he'll contribute on offense too. That is the absolute opposite of a knock on the guy. It's just the people buying into him being a full time two way player in the NFL like he was at Colorado who gets their panties in a wad over just stating the simple reality that he ain't gonna be a full time two way player at the NFL level with 17 games seasons and no Travis Hunter fan should want that either if you want the guy to make it to a second contract.
    • You do know you have to be invited to College GameDay? They called him out there and asked him about it and he answered it. And do you think he would have this type of interactions with a coach he doesn't have that type of relationship with? You're reaching to the furthest extent lol. I've seen a video of Hunter literally getting cursed out by Shedeur by not catching a BAD pass from Sanders and he didn't say anything just went out and caught a TD pass the next play! A "diva" would've got into a shouting match with his QB 
    • WHAT?!?!?!?! Honestly for the life of me, I can't figure out what you're saying here.  How are you saying their supporting casts cancel each other out and Hunter STILL had the better season? The supporting cast is LITERALLY the reason that he had the better season statistically.  If you put T-Mac on Colorado in place of Hunter, I'm 100% convinced he'd have had better stats than Hunter did, as he already had almost the same number of catches, and more yards, with a significantly worse QB and with zero other offensive weapons to take any attention away from him like Hunter had. If you think Hunter having 7 more TDs is more because of Hunter vs T-Mac and not because Hunter's QB had literally DOUBLE the number of TD's this year than T-Mac's QB, then I have some Arizona oceanfront property to sell you.
×
×
  • Create New...