Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

$8 million+ RB's since 2010


kungfoodude
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, CanadianCat said:

Right. Im not saying he is selfish, but he is a business.

But getting tagged as a RB is about the worst position to do that to as the theory is to not pay or commit long term to them. So I agree he wouldn't do that during his rookie deal, if he got tagged I could see it happening. Regardless it didn't happen so we are debating a hypothetical situation that didn't happen lol 

True. He will never be looking at a franchise tag the rest of his career. Nor will he ever be looking at top RB money again. 

Hurney got us. It sucks for the Carolina Panthers but CMC will make out like a bandit, no doubt about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

True. He will never be looking at a franchise tag the rest of his career. Nor will he ever be looking at top RB money again. 

Hurney got us. It sucks for the Carolina Panthers but CMC will make out like a bandit, no doubt about it.

Im not overly disappointed in it at the end of the day. The 'smart thing' might have been to let him walk but could you imagine this team without CMC after everyone else we lost? Plus, if we do get a rookie QB then a pass catching RB is their best friend. 

By the time the new QB is off their rookie deal CMC will also be off his, so his salary will not really be a major hinderance to the roster building process. We can say we over paid for positional value but its not really 'hurting' the team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, CanadianCat said:

Im not overly disappointed in it at the end of the day. The 'smart thing' might have been to let him walk but could you imagine this team without CMC after everyone else we lost? Plus, if we do get a rookie QB then a pass catching RB is their best friend. 

By the time the new QB is off their rookie deal CMC will also be off his, so his salary will not really be a major hinderance to the roster building process. We can say we over paid for positional value but its not really 'hurting' the team. 

Of course I can imagine it. It happened last year. We were actually pretty good offensively still. We rushed for 1704 yards, 19 TD's and a 4.2 YPC average in 2020 and 1819 yards, 20 TD's and a 4.7 YPC average in 2019. It really wouldn't have been the end of our offense. When he went out, a lot of his receiving load just went to Davis and Samuel. Are those guys as good as CMC? Of course not, but we didn't fall off a cliff either.

And Mike Davis has 59 receptions last year, so I don't think we would just stop throwing to the RB if CMC wasn't here or doesn't play. The biggest blow to the team is basically the contract size. If he remains here for the rest of his contract, he will likely consistently be in the 4-6 paid players on the roster and that is taking away cap space for much more valuable positions(DE, WR, OL, etc). 

I suspect he will probably end up not making the end of his contract, however, so we may indeed avoid the bulk of the worst cap hit years(2023/2024). Or, perhaps he produces at an elite level for the remainder of his contract and that will work, as well.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...