Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We may have checked on Wentz


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

First up, Eagles writer Jeff McLane explains where the holdup on the trade appears to be.

Makes sense. Like the Lions with Stafford, they're trying to accommodate him, but they don't have to. Thus, unless the Colts up their offer, he remains in limbo, and likely a Bear.

One fan asked if there was any chance of him not being traded. McLane answered he thinks "that ship has sailed".

Then another asked whether the Panthers might be a potential destination.

Back in, apparently indicating there was a time when we were in, but now we're out.

I'm guessing we weren't offering much if anything, but it's interesting nonetheless to think that we inquired.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:

My Eagles fan friend is super down with a Chicago trade. What he heard was Foles, Mack, and their first. That seems insane for Wentz and a no brainer. Though could just be standard speculation.

The top offer made for Wentz was two 2nds and a possible future 3rd or 4th by the colts. Anything else out there is being drummed up by the eagles to try to increase his price. No way the bears send mack, foles, and a 1st for a broken Wentz.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, PootieNunu said:

The top offer made for Wentz was two 2nds and a possible future 3rd or 4th by the colts. Anything else out there is being drummed up by the eagles to try to increase his price. No way the bears send mack, foles, and a 1st for a broken Wentz.

I think all they really care about is Foles and some kind of pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom lines to me are that a) we played well enough to beat the best team in the league and b) Bryce Young is growing into a bridge QB role (his ceiling) for us. As much as I don't want BY around after the season, it seems DC can still build the O with a game manager at QB for now. Best case scanario, we can build the D through the draft this year and take a QB we have conviction outside the 1st this or next draft. If BY keeps improving, we are going to win a couple more games this year.
    • Bryce has been a completely different QB since coming back. That started in Denver where it was obviously he was playing a lot more loose and willing to push the ball downfield  Bryce continues to build off of the previous weeks performance and that’s what you want to see Bryce has been making some real good anticipation throws. Reading defenses well. Pushing the ball downfield (7 throws of 20+ air yards yesterday. 8 if you want to include PI to Thielen). The deep ball accuracy has been there. Some of Young’s best throws yesterday were incompletions. Sideline balls to XL and Moore both should’ve been caught. RZ dot to Tremble should’ve been caught. And another RZ ball to Moore that Young gave him a chance at. Bryce is starting to execute Canales offense and yesterday Canales finally opened it up a bit. Canales was to blame for the 126 passing yards in Germany as he played a more conservative game.  The next bit I’m looking for his for Young to be a bit more decisive with running the ball. Start putting that on film and it’ll help open things up a tad
    • This KC team isn't the juggernaut it once was.  How many one score games have they won this season?  How many of those one score wins would probably have been loses if Mahomes wasn't the QB?  Their secondary is vulnerable and it was obvious today.  Grandpa Thielen was able to get open at will all game long. Bryce played well, but thinking this is the exact same KC defense Young was able to move the ball against as last year isn't going to compute.  Last year's KC defense was #2 overall.  They have regressed. I've said it before, Bryce can move the ball before the red zone, but once there, he struggles.  He is not a threat with his legs and the passing windows get much tighter.  He's not turning the ball over, so that is a great place to start and build upon.  I still question much better he can get.  Beyond a game manager?  I highly doubt it.
×
×
  • Create New...