Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

After looking at Remmers protecting Mahomes, we owe Cam an apology


Call Me James
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, kungfoodude said:

Yes but there is a flurry of interest over guys like Carr, Wentz and Darnold. Those are all potential suitors for Deshaun Watson. Why be late to the party and miss out on maximizing the value?

Because if you don't want to trade him in the first place, letting all the potential suitors get someone else doesn't exactly hurt your purpose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

Yes but there is a flurry of interest over guys like Carr, Wentz and Darnold. Those are all potential suitors for Deshaun Watson. Why be late to the party and miss out on maximizing the value?

I don't think they're gonna have any trouble maximizing his value. The teams with the type of trade e capital to go after Watson  aren't sniffing around Wentz and Darnold. Carr, maybe but that only takes one team out of the mix.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

McNair is clearly a buffoon. The rumors of Watt wanting out to make this more complicated because now you are looking at a situation where your two leaders on offense and defense want to jump ship.

If I am the Texans, I get these deals done ASAP and field every offer. Right now the market is nuclear hot and dragging your feet is just likely to get you less and less on the open market for either of these guys. 

I expect the Texans will drag this out until after the draft and then end up having to deal with whatever teams didn't address the QB position. That isn't a spot I would want to be in.

That's a very plausible scenario.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Because if you don't want to trade him in the first place, letting all the potential suitors get someone else doesn't exactly hurt your purpose.

But that's the thing that they don't seem to be getting. Every single shred of any evidence indicates Watson wants to leave and badly. It's a franchise that let it's previous dipshit coach/GM trade away just about every thing of value in the draft. This is the opportunity to get the franchise back on track for rebuilding. 

If they fug this up, they will be in the cellar of the NFL for a long, long time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

But that's the thing that they don't seem to be getting. Every single shred of any evidence indicates Watson wants to leave and badly. It's a franchise that let it's previous dipshit coach/GM trade away just about every thing of value in the draft. This is the opportunity to get the franchise back on track for rebuilding. 

If they fug this up, they will be in the cellar of the NFL for a long, long time. 

I don't have a whole lotta doubt that's gonna happen.

It's only a question of how they do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I don't think they're gonna have any trouble maximizing his value. The teams with the type of trade e capital to go after Watson  aren't sniffing around Wentz and Darnold. Carr, maybe but that only takes one team out of the mix.

To be determined. Like I said, the more suitors you have, the more likely you are to get an LA Rams type offer and not a Carolina Panthers type offer. Bidding wars are never bad for trades. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

To be determined. Like I said, the more suitors you have, the more likely you are to get an LA Rams type offer and not a Carolina Panthers type offer. Bidding wars are never bad for trades. 

There will be no shortage of suitors when the time comes. I don't blame the Texans a bit for first exhausting any and all efforts to keep him in Houston first. That's what I'd be doing too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

There will be no shortage of suitors when the time comes. I don't blame the Texans a bit for first exhausting any and all efforts to keep him in Houston first. That's what I'd be doing too.

I agree, but until they fire Easterby it's hard for me to say they're "exhausting all efforts".

That should be Effort #1!

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

There will be no shortage of suitors when the time comes.

Again, that depends on how long you wait. 

If Wentz, Darnold and Carr all get traded, those are teams that are now off the board due to trading away assets or having established QB positions. Let's say the rumor of Andrew Luck returning is true, that is another team off the board. If the draft happens, that is four more teams off the board that have established QB positions. So, again, that has lessened the amount of suitors to drive up the price. Not to mention you lose the ability to potentially cash in on one of the QB's in this draft class. 

That doesn't mean they won't still get a haul for Watson, but it could very well mean that they didn't maximize the value of that haul. I am not advocating they make a trade tomorrow but by God I'd start taking bids for him and figure it out from there. 

Edited by kungfoodude
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

Again, that depends on how long you wait. 

If Wentz, Darnold and Carr all get traded, those are teams that are now off the board due to trading away assets or having established QB positions. Let's say the rumor of Andrew Luck returning is true, that is another team off the board. If the draft happens, that is four more teams off the board that have established QB positions. So, again, that has lessened the amount of suitors to drive up the price. Not to mention you lose the ability to potentially cash in on one of the QB's in this draft class. 

That doesn't mean they won't still get a haul for Watson, but it could very well mean that they didn't maximize the value of that haul. I am not advocating they make a trade tomorrow but by God I'd start taking bids for him and figure it out from there. 

Once you start openly taking bids he's as good as gone. He knows he's won the staredown at that point. As long as you're trying to hang onto him you've got to put up the front of he isn't available, period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Once you start openly taking bids he's as good as gone. He knows he's won the staredown at that point. As long as you're trying to hang onto him you've got to put up the front of he isn't available, period.

I personally believe he has decided that he won't play there any longer(TBD if this is the case, obviously). In that scenario, winning the staredown isn't the optimal solution, getting the best situation for your franchise is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, electro's horse said:

fwiw remmers was mostly fine during the year. he wasn't a strength of the team or anything but he wasn't a swinging gate. 

he was just massively exposed during the super bowl, and there was a combination of him not being able to handle what was happening and the panthers failing to adjust...anything...to help him. 

then the right side of the line completely collapsed and that was that. 

I recall Remmers getting beat pretty badly during the 2015 season too. Someone had 3 sacks against him in 1 game. I cant remember who it was now.

 

I think he gave up several sacks in a couple games that season. 

Edited by jfo89
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom lines to me are that a) we played well enough to beat the best team in the league and b) Bryce Young is growing into a bridge QB role (his ceiling) for us. As much as I don't want BY around after the season, it seems DC can still build the O with a game manager at QB for now. Best case scanario, we can build the D through the draft this year and take a QB we have conviction outside the 1st this or next draft. If BY keeps improving, we are going to win a couple more games this year.
    • Bryce has been a completely different QB since coming back. That started in Denver where it was obviously he was playing a lot more loose and willing to push the ball downfield  Bryce continues to build off of the previous weeks performance and that’s what you want to see Bryce has been making some real good anticipation throws. Reading defenses well. Pushing the ball downfield (7 throws of 20+ air yards yesterday. 8 if you want to include PI to Thielen). The deep ball accuracy has been there. Some of Young’s best throws yesterday were incompletions. Sideline balls to XL and Moore both should’ve been caught. RZ dot to Tremble should’ve been caught. And another RZ ball to Moore that Young gave him a chance at. Bryce is starting to execute Canales offense and yesterday Canales finally opened it up a bit. Canales was to blame for the 126 passing yards in Germany as he played a more conservative game.  The next bit I’m looking for his for Young to be a bit more decisive with running the ball. Start putting that on film and it’ll help open things up a tad
    • This KC team isn't the juggernaut it once was.  How many one score games have they won this season?  How many of those one score wins would probably have been loses if Mahomes wasn't the QB?  Their secondary is vulnerable and it was obvious today.  Grandpa Thielen was able to get open at will all game long. Bryce played well, but thinking this is the exact same KC defense Young was able to move the ball against as last year isn't going to compute.  Last year's KC defense was #2 overall.  They have regressed. I've said it before, Bryce can move the ball before the red zone, but once there, he struggles.  He is not a threat with his legs and the passing windows get much tighter.  He's not turning the ball over, so that is a great place to start and build upon.  I still question much better he can get.  Beyond a game manager?  I highly doubt it.
×
×
  • Create New...