Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trubisky rumors


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

This argument that Mitch had good WRs is pretty silly.  Very serviceable RB at best as well. If Mitch gets into a situation where is isn't trying too hard he can be good.  How big a step up he is from Teddy is debatable.  Still, he has good upside at 26 in the right offense.  

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

FWIW, I wouldn't hate kicking the tires on Trubisky, Chicago is a place of sorrow and despair for QB's and he came into the NFL with John Fox and now has Matt Nagy, both of which certifiably suck.  Trubisky was always a project that needed extra coaching at the next level, and I dont think he ever got that coaching in the NFL, could be good with Rhule and co.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheCasillas said:

This same anthony Miller? 
https://www.google.com/amp/s/bearswire.usatoday.com/2021/01/15/has-anthony-miller-played-his-last-down-with-the-bears/amp/

 

anthony Miller has been downright awful. I watch bears game almost as much as panthers. Their WR corps will be overhauled this offseason. They played bad with both foles and Mitch. 
 

david Montgomery was their third best receiver. Trubisky wasn’t the problem, it’s the entire roster of the bears on offense that’s the problem.

So, you're saying that Trubisky isn't a problem? I've seen him play a little, and I'm not sure that he's a legit starter, much less a franchise QB! I distinctly remember his accuracy being all over the place. I'll give him some benefit of doubt for a suboptimal receiving corps, but he's still been sketchy on his reads and with his accuracy. He may be too far gone now. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, top dawg said:

So, you're saying that Trubisky isn't a problem? I've seen him play a little, and I'm not sure that he's a legit starter, much less a franchise QB! I distinctly remember his accuracy being all over the place. I'll give him some benefit of doubt for a suboptimal receiving corps, but he's still been sketchy on his reads and with his accuracy. He may be too far gone now. 

He went 6-3 with 17 total TDs and 67% completion rate (bears franchise record) this season. He missed some throws, yes.. but it isn’t a mechanics piece. He is also in one of shittiest offensive systems in the league. Hence why Nagy will NOT bc the OC and HC next year. Just the HC.

 

not saying Mitch is a world beater, but in the next system he plays... I bet he will turn some heads. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The only way I would be onboard with rolling the dice on a Trubisky rehab effort is if we feel certain we can unload Teddy's contract via trade so that he would "only" hit us for $10M this year.

That's the only way man. It would be insane to carry both. Why not just draft QB with a better contract if you're keeping Teddy. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't get the Hunter hate. Just imagine his ceiling if he stopped trying to be this 2way freak and focused on one side of the ball 
    • 100%.  You have to play the cards that are dealt.  Not the cards you wish were dealt.
    • I'd say its definitely going to be addressed this off-season.  We went into the last draft with a roster of RBs including:  Chubba, Blackshear, and Miles Sanders. We picked Jonathan Brooks in the second and still signed Rashaad Penny afterwards.  Fast forward....One turned into a top 10 back, 1 is injured/out for most if not all the '25 season, 1 retired, 1 will either take a huge paycut or be cut, and the last is a restricted free agent. We brought in Mike Boone as well. Add him to the free agent list also.  We need a physical option.    Which qualifies:  Ashton Jeanty(Boise St): Overall ranked Top 10. Almost 2k yards after contact, 28 tds. Would take our first rounder. My money would be on an NFC East team selecting him. (97.2 PFF run grade) - 121 forced missed tackles.  Omarion Hampton(UNC): Ranked everywhere from 20 - 59 overall. Consensus #2 back after Jeanty. He'll be a second rounder. 1,222 Yards after contact w/ 15 tds.  (90.5 PFF run grade) - 72 forced missed Tackles Kaleb Johnson(Iowa): Ranked from 38 - 69 depending on which media outlet you prefer but generally #3. 2nd/3rd possibly. 1,060 Yards after contact w/ 21 tds.(86.7 PFF run grade)- 66 forced missed tackles Cam Skattebo: Ranked from the 50's - 104. Every mock I do he ends up BPA at some point. 969 Yards after contact w/ 17 tds(92 PFF Run Grade). Probably the best receiving back of the group. 81 forced missed tackles.  If the '24 and '25 draft classes were combined, IMO the rankings would be, in order: Jeanty, Hampton, Brooks, Johnson, Skattebo. I wouldn't take one high but I'd take one for Chubba and Brooks insurance. 
×
×
  • Create New...