Trubisky rumors

[Shocker]

This argument that Mitch had good WRs is pretty silly.  Very serviceable RB at best as well. If Mitch gets into a situation where is isn't trying too hard he can be good.  How big a step up he is from Teddy is debatable.  Still, he has good upside at 26 in the right offense.  

Edited February 6, 2021 by Shocker

[Little Goody Two Shoes]

Come on Mr. Scott, don't feed the Tartrolls.

[Newbie]

2 hours ago, Jase said:

how many draft picks would they be willing to part with for us to take him off their hands?

He’s a free agent so it wouldn’t cost us any picks. 

[Carolina Cajun]

FWIW, I wouldn't hate kicking the tires on Trubisky, Chicago is a place of sorrow and despair for QB's and he came into the NFL with John Fox and now has Matt Nagy, both of which certifiably suck.  Trubisky was always a project that needed extra coaching at the next level, and I dont think he ever got that coaching in the NFL, could be good with Rhule and co.

[top dawg]

1 hour ago, TheCasillas said:

This same anthony Miller? 
https://www.google.com/amp/s/bearswire.usatoday.com/2021/01/15/has-anthony-miller-played-his-last-down-with-the-bears/amp/

 

anthony Miller has been downright awful. I watch bears game almost as much as panthers. Their WR corps will be overhauled this offseason. They played bad with both foles and Mitch. 
 

david Montgomery was their third best receiver. Trubisky wasn’t the problem, it’s the entire roster of the bears on offense that’s the problem.

So, you're saying that Trubisky isn't a problem? I've seen him play a little, and I'm not sure that he's a legit starter, much less a franchise QB! I distinctly remember his accuracy being all over the place. I'll give him some benefit of doubt for a suboptimal receiving corps, but he's still been sketchy on his reads and with his accuracy. He may be too far gone now. 

[TheCasillas]

33 minutes ago, top dawg said:

So, you're saying that Trubisky isn't a problem? I've seen him play a little, and I'm not sure that he's a legit starter, much less a franchise QB! I distinctly remember his accuracy being all over the place. I'll give him some benefit of doubt for a suboptimal receiving corps, but he's still been sketchy on his reads and with his accuracy. He may be too far gone now. 

He went 6-3 with 17 total TDs and 67% completion rate (bears franchise record) this season. He missed some throws, yes.. but it isn’t a mechanics piece. He is also in one of shittiest offensive systems in the league. Hence why Nagy will NOT bc the OC and HC next year. Just the HC.

 

not saying Mitch is a world beater, but in the next system he plays... I bet he will turn some heads. 

[Carl Spackler]

Trubisky is a younger Teddy. Pass

[Verge]

Don't be so surprised...

[TheCasillas]

10 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

Trubisky is a younger Teddy. Pass

Humor me. In what way? They don’t have a single trait in common.

[Mr. Scot]

2 hours ago, Little Goody Two Shoes said:

Come on Mr. Scott, don't feed the Tartrolls.

I just share what I see, dude.

[BurnNChinn]

4 minutes ago, Verge said:

Don't be so surprised...

If we sign Trubisky?

[Snake]

9 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The only way I would be onboard with rolling the dice on a Trubisky rehab effort is if we feel certain we can unload Teddy's contract via trade so that he would "only" hit us for $10M this year.

That's the only way man. It would be insane to carry both. Why not just draft QB with a better contract if you're keeping Teddy. 

[Chief Keek]

[Tepper's Chest Hair]

8 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Probably... except Wentz.

That one never really had any traction

Not nearly the same as something like Stafford.  But just like 2 days ago ESPN had a "top trade destinations" article for Wentz and Carolina was listed.