Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mac Jones Draft Stock


Recommended Posts

On 2/1/2021 at 5:56 PM, Beerfacedlegend said:

I’d take him at #2 only person I’d take over Mac jones is Lawrence 

If you watched the Coaches Corner broadcast of the National Championship game, you'd see why Jones was so productive.

Literally every pass he hit in that game was scripted. He didn't come off of his first read on any pass play that I saw. The RPO game was too much for Ohio State, Jones made his ONE read on his key, and made the pass to his FIRST read, every time. Ohio State ran a lot of single high safety in order to contain the run game, thinking they could get pressure on Jones and force some errant throws. But, they only got pressure once or twice and every single RPO Jones made the read and the throw. 

His production was based on the talent surrounding him and the offense, not his abilities. Did he make the throws? Sure. But in the NFL you're asked to do more than make the one read given for a play based on one defensive key. I wouldn't take Jones before Round 4. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

If you watched the Coaches Corner broadcast of the National Championship game, you'd see why Jones was so productive.

Literally every pass he hit in that game was scripted. He didn't come off of his first read on any pass play that I saw. The RPO game was too much for Ohio State, Jones made his ONE read on his key, and made the pass to his FIRST read, every time. Ohio State ran a lot of single high safety in order to contain the run game, thinking they could get pressure on Jones and force some errant throws. But, they only got pressure once or twice and every single RPO Jones made the read and the throw. 

His production was based on the talent surrounding him and the offense, not his abilities. Did he make the throws? Sure. But in the NFL you're asked to do more than make the one read given for a play based on one defensive key. I wouldn't take Jones before Round 4. 

Bingo. People get caught up in the results and overlook what led to them. He's accurate. He's smart. I'm sure he works hard and is a great teammate. But, he's very athletically limited.

Wait... am I talking about Mac Jones or Teddy Bridgewater?

I honestly don't think they're all that dissimilar.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Bingo. People get caught up in the results and overlook what led to them. He's accurate. He's smart. I'm sure he works hard and is a great teammate. But, he's very athletically limited.

Wait... am I talking about Mac Jones or Teddy Bridgewater?

I honestly don't think they're all that dissimilar.

I am starting to see it.  His job was to put the ball in the pre-determined area on time.  3 stud WRs, a stud C, LT, G, RB---hard to imagine screwing up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Bingo. People get caught up in the results and overlook what led to them. He's accurate. He's smart. I'm sure he works hard and is a great teammate. But, he's very athletically limited.

Wait... am I talking about Mac Jones or Teddy Bridgewater?

I honestly don't think they're all that dissimilar.

Honestly, what Fields was asked to do was far more complex than anything Jones did throughout the season. I also like Fields athletic ability. I feel like he could have a Herbert like year in this offense. A lot of people here seem to dislike Brady but much of Brady's offense was built to do what Teddy is comfortable with.

I also saw a thread on a potential Jimmy G trade with Teddy, where most people said they are the same guy. Jimmy G has a YPA of at least a yard higher than Teddy every season they have played. Jimmy also hasn't had receivers in New England or San Francisco, other than Kittle, that come close to what we currently have. I tend to believe we'd get the Jimmy G who stepped up when Brady was out. He's not a dink and dunk guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

Honestly, what Fields was asked to do was far more complex than anything Jones did throughout the season. I also like Fields athletic ability. I feel like he could have a Herbert like year in this offense. A lot of people here seem to dislike Brady but much of Brady's offense was built to do what Teddy is comfortable with.

I also saw a thread on a potential Jimmy G trade with Teddy, where most people said they are the same guy. Jimmy G has a YPA of at least a yard higher than Teddy every season they have played. Jimmy also hasn't had receivers in New England or San Francisco, other than Kittle, that come close to what we currently have. I tend to believe we'd get the Jimmy G who stepped up when Brady was out. He's not a dink and dunk guy.

Fields is definitely an intriguing prospect but he also definitely runs hot/cold. In all fairness, so did Cam.

Jimmy G is definitely better than Teddy. I don't think he's a LOT better but definitely better. I still don't think he's good enough and when combined with the notable durability concerns I think he's just a flat out no go IMO.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Fields is definitely an intriguing prospect but he also definitely runs hot/cold. In all fairness, so did Cam.

Jimmy G is definitely better than Teddy. I don't think he's a LOT better but definitely better. I still don't think he's good enough and when combined with the notable durability concerns I think he's just a flat out no go IMO.

Again, depends on the guy you get. 

As an aside, I found it interesting that Brian Kelly was asked about his margin of defeat in BCS/Playoffs because they lost by 14 to Alabama but no one asked Ryan Day about it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His stock is in the right spot , fields will fall . Mac jones will be our pick at 8 or tre lance depends which type of offense we want to run . But rhules offense screams quick smart Mac jones . People hate the guy because he has a dad bod and doesn’t lift also does help that a lot of people in the Carolinas hate Alabama 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Beerfacedlegend said:

His stock is in the right spot , fields will fall . Mac jones will be our pick at 8 or tre lance depends which type of offense we want to run . But rhules offense screams quick smart Mac jones . People hate the guy because he has a dad bod and doesn’t lift also does help that a lot of people in the Carolinas hate Alabama 

No it’s because he is not worth a first rd pick but keep dreaming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, CPcavedweller said:

Honestly, what Fields was asked to do was far more complex than anything Jones did throughout the season. I also like Fields athletic ability. I feel like he could have a Herbert like year in this offense. A lot of people here seem to dislike Brady but much of Brady's offense was built to do what Teddy is comfortable with.

I also saw a thread on a potential Jimmy G trade with Teddy, where most people said they are the same guy. Jimmy G has a YPA of at least a yard higher than Teddy every season they have played. Jimmy also hasn't had receivers in New England or San Francisco, other than Kittle, that come close to what we currently have. I tend to believe we'd get the Jimmy G who stepped up when Brady was out. He's not a dink and dunk guy.

Again this is why Draft season is so intriguing. I disagree with your posts about Fields and Jones. 

To me, Fields comes from a one read system - Ohio St are notorious for only asking their QB to read half the field and, if nothing is there immediately, to take off. 

Jones ran a much more complex system at Alabama and was asked to process a lot of information. You don't throw 40+ TDs, hold off a 5 star QB and appease Sarkisian (now the Texas HC) and Saban if you're a limited QB during a National Title run. Sarkisian's system was sensational and obviously Jones is surrounded by NFL talent, but the dude just went out there an executed. Bottom line. 

 

TL;DR: Fields is a fantastic athlete for the QB position who still has question marks for me concerning his ability to see the field. Jones barely clears the bar athletically as an NFL QB, but clearly processes the field well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OldhamA said:

Again this is why Draft season is so intriguing. I disagree with your posts about Fields and Jones. 

To me, Fields comes from a one read system - Ohio St are notorious for only asking their QB to read half the field and, if nothing is there immediately, to take off. 

Jones ran a much more complex system at Alabama and was asked to process a lot of information. You don't throw 40+ TDs, hold off a 5 star QB and appease Sarkisian (now the Texas HC) and Saban if you're a limited QB during a National Title run. Sarkisian's system was sensational and obviously Jones is surrounded by NFL talent, but the dude just went out there an executed. Bottom line. 

 

TL;DR: Fields is a fantastic athlete for the QB position who still has question marks for me concerning his ability to see the field. Jones barely clears the bar athletically as an NFL QB, but clearly processes the field well. 

I think there’s a stat out there showing most of Fields biggest plays came from his second or third read. He torched Clemson on second reads. I don’t believe Mac Jones had to make many reads. He called hike and Smith was open. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Easily. To be able to plug in a backup LT without much drop off from your starter? That could mean the difference between playoffs or sitting at home in January. Good/serviceable smart young and healthy LTs that won’t lose you a ball game at reasonable $$ don’t just come along every day. Everyone talks about the most important positions on a football team… backup LT is in the top 10.  Picture next year… the team is scrappy and competitive, 4 and 3 record, second place in the South. Morale is good. devastating run game that Let’s our marginal defense get plenty of rest. We play the Bucs and win, going to 5 and 3, but we lose Ickey to a high ankle sprain. Atl loses that week and are now at 5 and 3 as well. There is no Ickey and no BC because we let him go… and we go in to Atl the next week for a battle of first in the south. Week after that is the Jets…. Now they lose both by 10 and 3, respectively, and fall to 5 and 5 going in to their bye week. Atl is at 7 and 3. Out of typical Panthers desperation, they try to rush Ickey back in to the lineup with a saints game coming up…  Back to good old Panthers football, always playing catchup. Another season at .500 and the fans sadly rejoice in mediocrity, when playoffs were in reach. This team always overestimates its ability to pick up quality o line depth in the draft or FA and it always blows up in their faces. Like Chuba, I see him as being part of the core that Dan is trying to build. Work on his contract now and see if we can come out with something mutually beneficial. I’d consider 3 yrs at $25m to be very fair. 
    • it would be great to have "double trouble" again, I even had a T- shirt for Williams and Stewart and the double trouble logo, was a great time to be Panthers fan. We shall see...
    • Sounds like a plan. Those are the teams we should be mimicking! lol
×
×
  • Create New...