Rams tried to trade for Aaron Rodgers first

[Kuhndog94]

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

He's a first found pick who's looked so bad that he's now third string behind an undrafted free agent.

Why would we want him?

Wassa joke

[Mr. Scot]

Just now, Kuhndog94 said:

Wassa joke

Gotcha.

[45catfan]

4 minutes ago, MilkyCastles said:

Your point was that La couldn’t replicate TB’s result with Rodgers because there’s only ONE Brady. But in reality LA has a great roster, and in reality Rodgers is a better QB than Brady, by what margin is irrelevant to the conversation. So are you saying that teams that make a move like that are ultimately unsuccessful and it’s detrimental to them long term? Because if so you’re initial comment did not indicate that whatsoever, seemed like you were directly comparing two teams and two QB’s ala your NBA analogy- which isn’t really an analogy because it’s the exact same thing as the original scenario just nba instead of nfl, so doesn’t really help illuminate any greater point. 
 

MY point is that LA with Rodgers would be insane, and would be so much fun to watch, and undoubtedly would be Super Bowl favorites going into next year. 

Could LA get to the Super Bowl with Rogers at the helm, particularly in year one?  Sure, but TB actually did it and LA is just trying to copy it.  Imitation is the best form of flattery.  However, when you are using THE standard as your reference point, be mindful that your expectations might not be met.

[Mr. Scot]

Reports coming out seem to indicate that the Rams really wanted to move on from Goff by just about any means necessary.

McVay still believes his offense is superior but apparently didn't think  Goff would be able to maximize what it could do.