Two 1st, Two 2nd, 2 young players

[WarPanthers89]

15 minutes ago, cookinbrak said:

I'd love to be high enough for that to make sense.

I meant the two 2nd round picks are equal to another 1st round pick (making it the value of three 1st round picks that they have been talking about this entire time)

[Moo Daeng]

If this is the price then you don't need to worry about who because it's not happening 

[OldhamA]

Why even bother hiring a GM if you take that deal?

He's going to have no Draft picks for the next two years.

[unicar15]

35 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

So, basically it would be two 1sts, two 2nds, and two of Burns, Chinn, and Brown.

Sorry, I just can't do it. I'd LOVE to have Watson but I can't do that. That's basically the equivalent of four 1sts and two 2nds.

Why do you guys all assume that two young players means...”we aren’t making a deal unless you give us two 23 year old future pro bowlers on rookie deals.”

They could just as easily be interested in Jackson who could fit scheme. Maybe they liked Gross Matos in the draft? Who knows...

Edited January 31, 2021 by unicar15
Correction

[LinvilleGorge]

1 minute ago, unicar15 said:

Why do you guys all assume that two young players means...”we aren’t making a deal unless you give us two 23 year old future pro bowlers on rookie deals.”

The tweet said young starters. Who else are you offering? They're not taking Shaq's contract. One of the reason they're going to want "young" is the rookie contracts 

[mrcompletely11]

50 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

From what I understand McClain is pretty connected with the Texans.  I doubt he came up with the numbers by himself, someone is probably whispering in his ear.

Ive said all along it will probably take at least a combination of “5” for Watson. Three 1st and 2 players, 4 1st and a player maybe they take two seconds instead of one of the first like McClain is saying.  Maybe they count the #2 overall pick of the Jets as multiple 1st.
 

Either way, all of you holding out this idea that Watson and his so called leverage is going to make trading for him cheaper need to give up on that idea. 
 

I do find it interesting that they are looking for young players also, minimizes the risk of them missing on all of the draft picks.

That does help us though, we definitely  have decent young players, especially on defense that we could include in a trade. 
 

Based on this tweet the starting point for the Panthers would be something like two 1st, 2 2nds, and Burns and Brown or Chinn. 
 

How many people would be happy with that? 

 

good luck with that texans

[TheSpecialJuan]

50 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

From what I understand McClain is pretty connected with the Texans.  I doubt he came up with the numbers by himself, someone is probably whispering in his ear.

Ive said all along it will probably take at least a combination of “5” for Watson. Three 1st and 2 players, 4 1st and a player maybe they take two seconds instead of one of the first like McClain is saying.  Maybe they count the #2 overall pick of the Jets as multiple 1st.
 

Either way, all of you holding out this idea that Watson and his so called leverage is going to make trading for him cheaper need to give up on that idea. 
 

I do find it interesting that they are looking for young players also, minimizes the risk of them missing on all of the draft picks.

That does help us though, we definitely  have decent young players, especially on defense that we could include in a trade. 
 

Based on this tweet the starting point for the Panthers would be something like two 1st, 2 2nds, and Burns and Brown or Chinn. 
 

How many people would be happy with that? 

 

DEAL !

[ForJimmy]

Ok ok 2 first rounders, 2 second, and Boston and Whitehead. Enjoy!

[LegioX]

Yeah no thanks. We make that deal we lose half our young stars for just 1? F that 

[TheProcess]

YGM and Jackson

 

[davos]

Would including Shaq+YGM give us too much of a dent on the D?

At this point, I'd rather trade up in the draft but we just have to keep Chinn, Brown & Burns.  All three have perennial all-pro potential.

[CPF4LIFE]

No thanks, not interested in giving up Brown, Chinn, Burns. If they could take CMC, Shaq, Jackson then all for it.

We went a long time with a old veteran defense who couldnt produce and we finally get some young talent to start over with just to give them up? Nah

Those guys have the potential to be the best at their positions in a couple years.  I dont want to walk away from that. Rather just trade up in the draft.

[TheMaulClaw]

Id give them DJ Moore and Shaq, love DJ but wee need a qb.

[TheCasillas]

28 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The tweet said young starters. Who else are you offering? They're not taking Shaq's contract. One of the reason they're going to want "young" is the rookie contracts 

Why not? We pay Shaq’s contract this year if we trade him. Then he goes on to be the 16th highest paid linebacker in the league next year. They can also cut him post June 1 and only have 3.2 in dead cap the next year. I don’t think contract would have much to do with it.

Edited January 31, 2021 by TheCasillas