Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: The Lions don’t seem to be getting as much interest in Matthew Stafford as expected


WarPanthers89
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

LOLOLOL

Stafford is not getting cut.

I agree, but the price could be going down being that they have already played themselves by announcing that he wanted out and that they have agreed to trade him. Teams know that he’s not on the team next year do they will be forced to move on no matter what

Edited by WarPanthers89
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, WarPanthers89 said:

I agree, but the price could be going down being that they have already played themselves by announcing that he wanted out and that they have agreed to trade him. Teams know that he’s not on the team next year do they will be forced to move on no matter what

As the off-season progresses, some of these QB needy teams are gonna strike out. There's a lot of off-season to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, WarPanthers89 said:

I agree, but the price could be going down being that they have already played themselves by announcing that he wanted out and that they have agreed to trade him.

An incredibly intelligent and attractive young lady I used to date had a great saying...

..."a girl always reserves the right to change her mind".

Ditto the Lions...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Peppers90 NC said:

Trades can’t be made til March, senior bowl is going on now. What’s the rush?

No rush but the deal can be made before that. Once a team announces that a player of available at his level, it normally moves fairly quick especially when it involves a franchise QB. Normally a deal is made but won’t be official until March 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • he averaged 2 yards in YAC per reception last year.  He can't generate quick separation.  He was debating retirement last year.    Yet we championing him as some great option.  AT is a savvy vet we force feed the ball too......on a team starved for basic offense the last couple seasons.  We overrated AT.  Which is why some freak when people like JT on his podcast point out the painfully obvious about him.   
    • The Athletic has us ranked 28th on their post-draft power rankings, mainly due to us picking T-Mc instead of defense in round 1. They recognize we needed WR help, but... https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6317651/2025/04/29/nfl-power-rankings-post-draft-rookies-eagles-chiefs-bills/
    • I mean, he is a slot technician.  That's what he does.  So, in a good offense, you would be trotting him out there on 3rd downs and situationally.....to not take what they give him but to move chains.  It's a niche.  AT hasn't threatened defenses in years.  Last time we saw Renfrow on the field he averaged..... 6 yards YAC per catch.  Adam Thielen last year averaged....2 yards in YAC per catch last year.  I still contend in reality, AT isn't a slot WR.  Not in reality.  He is an aging rec TE.  And those aren't the same thing.  AT simply can't generate quick separation or provide YAC.    
×
×
  • Create New...