Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

JStew for a Good Young QB? Hells to the Yes.


Zod

Recommended Posts

1. Deangelo is a perennial pro bowl feature back.

2. We have no QB.

3. Good RB's are much easier to draft than good QB's

4. Hurney/Fox would never have even drafted Stewart if they understood what they had in Deangelo.

5. Mike Goodson is a baller

Discuss

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also I'd like to point out an obvious flaw in your argument:

If good RBs are so much easier to draft than QBs, then what makes you think somebody will trade a promising young QB who has shown something, for a gently used RB?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Deangelo is a perennial pro bowl feature back. true.

2. We have no QB. true.

3. Good RB's are much easier to draft than good QB'strue.

4. Hurney/Fox would never have even drafted Stewart if they understood what they had in Deangelo. maybe.

5. Mike Goodson is a baller possible and i like what i have seen from sutton as well.

Discussdone.

jason campbell right? ;)
he said good.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also I'd like to point out an obvious flaw in your argument:

If good RBs are so much easier to draft than QBs, then what makes you think somebody will trade a promising young QB who has shown something, for a gently used RB?

Because JStew is not a good RB, he is a franchise RB. We do not need two franchise RBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...