Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Stafford Available


Untouchable
 Share

Recommended Posts

from the Darnold thread down the page a bit.

 

 
Lowest % of accurate passes thrown from a clean pocket in 2020, per

: 26. Drew Lock (60%)

27. Nick Mullens (59%)

28. Gardner Minshew (59%)

29. Matt Stafford (58%)

30. Sam Darnold (56%)

31. Mitch Trubisky (54%)

32. Carson Wentz (51%)

 

 

I suppose he could do better here.  Just like Darnold.

We're officially in quarterback hell.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, imminent rogaine said:

But what would we need to give up to get him? I like the idea of trading back, filling those holes, and grabbing a young QB like Mond or Costello later on. If we have to give up a bunch, then we won’t be able to fill those spots in the draft. 

If this is ultimately the scenario, I'd agree with your course of action.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stafford makes more sense cost wise than Watson does, but that's on the theory that we draft our future "franchise" QB within the next three years.

Detroit is going to want a first rounder back so I am just really unsure what we do now because Detroit is in the QB market and picks #7 ahead of us.

Should be interesting....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Leeroy Jenkins Ph.D. said:

Even after subtracting his signing and roster bonus, he is still due 13 mil this year and 20 mil next.  Let's throw big wads of cash at an injury prone QB... Wait, where have I seen this before.....

Injury prone? He has played 16 games every year except one in last 10 years.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BurnNChinn said:

We will not win 8 games with Teddy ever lmao

We probably could if we completely tricked out the defense and the oline and everyone stayed healthy . Basically become the Bears occasionally make the playoffs in the new format but always have early round exits . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...