Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Stafford Available

Untouchable

By Untouchable,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

imminent rogaine Experienced

imminent rogaine

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

New GM wants to upgrade QB/DB position and build out the lines.

Picking up Stafford would allow us to do that and remain within budget without trading one of our better young players.

Win, win and win.

But what would we need to give up to get him? I like the idea of trading back, filling those holes, and grabbing a young QB like Mond or Costello later on. If we have to give up a bunch, then we won’t be able to fill those spots in the draft. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hoenheim Grand Master

Hoenheim

Posted
Posted

Don't be surprised if the Lions and Falcons both draft a QB, along with the Jags and Jets. That's four teams minimum ahead of the Panthers that want QBs then you have teams right behind us like the Broncos , 49ers, Vikings, Patriots who could all trade in front of us for a QB.

 

If the Panthers staff really wants a competent QB they're going to have to make an extremely aggressive move (either trade up in R1 or trade picks and players for a free agent).

This would have been the perfect year to actually go 0-16 to 3-13 based on how fuging badly we need a QB but also preferring to keep rebuilding the team as a whole .

I could see half the fan base revolting if Fiterer does a massive trade down and we have a bunch of JAGs to go along with Teddy B in 2021 and we go 8-8.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Leeroy Jenkins Ph.D. said:

Hell no trading anything for Stafford would be rediculous. The Lions have already stated he isn't in their plans. At least wait for him to be released.

I would trade them a bad contract--like Shaq--but I do not think he gets released--Indy, Washington, New England--they all need a QB---but who knows?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Growl Veteran

Growl

Posted
Posted

the source of every awful QB take on this board centers around "being economical" 

It's okay to get a terrible player like Sam darnold, as long as you don't have to give up a bunch, afterall, when the cap space and draft picks are factored into our W/L record at the end of the season, were gonna wanna be well off there

 

The panthers need to spend big-they need to spend high draft picks, lots of them if necessary, and spend a whole lot of cap space if necessary as well

Spend spend spend and get an elite franchise player

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Growl Veteran

Growl

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

Of course Stafford wouldn't be the long term answer.  He'd be the stop gap measure TB was intended to be for us.  

Focus on O linemen and a DB this draft.  

and what pick are we gonna have when the time comes to transition

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Martin
      Why I Believe That We Will Trade Down

      By Martin · Posted

      I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • MHS831
      General Draft Rumors/Speculation Thread

      By MHS831 · Posted

      I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • MHS831
      General Draft Rumors/Speculation Thread

      By MHS831 · Posted

      After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...