Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CMC


Calboyz13
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

It’s hard to get through to dumb people.

People see what they want to see. Most vouching for a CMC trade were against drafting him to begin with. His injurious season last year is the crow they’ve been waiting to serve for 3 years. They’ll likely eat their share next year now that the organization has figured out they can spread the ball around and not put the entire workload on his back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ItsTheFluRe-Named said:

CMC is sickeningly overrated .. RB's that produce are easy to find, why pay big for one?

No, CMC isnt almost like a WR too .. WR's catch balls beyond 3 yards from the LOS or behind

Your sickeningly sick. Like the sickest. Idk how someone could be so sick to not understand that CMC is one of those guys that scores TDs in championships. To win ball games. Sometimes he does it beyond 3 yards from the LOS and sometimes he does it behind. He's a WR, a RB, and a threat to any part of the field. Every team needs that player on their team. It's just sick to underestimate the value of that.

 

Almost makes me wanna throw up.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Diehardpanther02 said:
2 hours ago, ItsTheFluRe-Named said:

CMC is sickeningly overrated .. RB's that produce are easy to find, why pay big for one?

No, CMC isnt almost like a WR too .. WR's catch balls beyond 3 yards from the LOS or behind

Your sickeningly sick. Like the sickest. Idk how someone could be so sick to not understand that CMC is one of those guys that scores TDs in championships. To win ball games. Sometimes he does it beyond 3 yards from the LOS and sometimes he does it behind. He's a WR, a RB, and a threat to any part of the field. Every team needs that player on their team. It's just sick to underestimate the value of that.

 

Almost makes me wanna throw up.

DeShaun and CMC are mutually exclusive...

...which would you rather have?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MHS831 said:

I am really disappointed in many of the newbs.  What the hell?

This thread must be a negative rep test by the admins or something. Two brand new posters with opposing cartoonish hot takes.

The huddle is a mysterious and whimsical place. ‘Tis always been as such. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, WarHeel said:

I mentioned it because people seem to think the only way we could pull off a trade is to give up our biggest asset. QB is the most important position in football but you don’t trade your best weapon leaving your new franchise QB without a future HOF weapon. 

I dont think they would want CMC. If they wanted a trade and players were involved, I would see them wanting Burns or Moore. They already have a high priced RB. People are speculating CMC because he's one of the best RBs in the NFL and he would probably be needed to make a trade of this magnitude work. I think they would want Burns, 2 1sts and 2nds. I dont see us making this move, but if we did, it wouldn't surprise if CMC had to be involved to make it work. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we could get Watkins by trading CMC, and are able to get Javonte Williams in the second round I think we end up better off. That’s not a slight at CMC. It’s just placing a higher value at a QB, and thinking very highly of Javonte. He would run very much like CMC between and outside the tackles (He doesn’t have the last gear like CMC or route tree, however). The benefit overall of Javonte plus Watkins is greater than Teddy and CMC. Teddy is the problem for CMC, not CMC himself.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Bostonheelfish said:

If we could get Watkins by trading CMC, and are able to get Javonte Williams in the second round I think we end up better off. That’s not a slight at CMC. It’s just placing a higher value at a QB, and thinking very highly of Javonte. He would run very much like CMC between and outside the tackles (He doesn’t have the last gear like CMC or route tree, however). The benefit overall of Javonte plus Watkins is greater than Teddy and CMC. Teddy is the problem for CMC, not CMC himself.

Watson. His last name is Watson. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ItsTheFluRe-Named said:

CMC is sickeningly overrated .. RB's that produce are easy to find, why pay big for one?

No, CMC isnt almost like a WR too .. WR's catch balls beyond 3 yards from the LOS or behind

Of course he's overrated.  I mean good god every running back can produce a 2000 yd season.   I think we have one projected in the 7th round that will be just as good.  

Your take is about as trollish as any I have seen.  

Do you watch football at all?  Name me one linebacker that can cover him one on one.  Hell I'd venture to say there probably aren't many CB that can handle him.  His route running is elite.

His salary is high, no doubt, but his ability to basically play two positions is why he is worth the money. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Of course he's overrated.  I mean good god every running back can produce a 2000 yd season.   I think we have one projected in the 7th round that will be just as good.  

Your take is about as trollish as any I have seen.  

Do you watch football at all?  Name me one linebacker that can cover him one on one.  Hell I'd venture to say there probably aren't many CB that can handle him.  His route running is elite.

His salary is high, no doubt, but his ability to basically play two positions is why he is worth the money. 

Sir do you watch football ? Christian McCaffrey is the only back in Carolina history to have a 2,000 yard season Jonathan Stewart didn’t do it DeAngelo Williams didn’t do it so it’s not as easy as you think sir and a 7th round back who cause last time I checked theirs no 7th rounders that’s have had a 2,000 yard season if that was the case Zeke would have it (had the best O-line in the league at one point) Karma would do it and for you to even lobby for Christian McCaffrey being traded shows how much you don’t know football you don’t gotta O line already and now you don’t gotta future Hall of Famer either Watson is 1-6 against Carolina even Steve smith said it would be a dumb trade cause your trading away way too many assets... that should tell you something Steve smith said no one could replace him until DJ Moore and he was right. That’s like trading a prime Cam Newton for Lamar Jackson.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have been on the Bech bandwagon since well before the SR Bowl.  Hoping that he would stay a hidden gem and we'd be smart enough to grab him late.  I just don't think Morgan cares as much about WR as we do
    • No one had posted in a month.  I don't think any of us were watching
    • Here is how this draft could get mind-blowingly complicated--Interesting comment about Jags floating the Jeanty idea to lure Chicago into a trade.  I have to think Ben Johnson is going to duplicate in many ways the success he had in Detroit, and I have to think their free agency was following the blueprint Carolina designed last year (one that the Saints designed before them with Brees) and they upgraded all of their interior linemen.  RT in Chicago is set; Johnson loves RT Darnell Wright.  However, at LT, Braxton Jones is coming off a December injury and is considered to be in a competition for the position this year by at least a few fans on the Bears Wire.  His PFF score, however, was solid, posting an 80+ score in pass protection and 70+ score in run blocking.  He is in his prime.  However, in some of their fan mocks, the Bears are taking a LT.  I thought they needed an Edge to play 4-3 strong side across from Sweat, but they signed Odeyingbo to a pretty big contract in March. For the Bears, in my view, it comes down to TE or Running Back. Kmet is their #1 TE and he had 474 yards in that role, which was 25th in the NFL last season for TEs.  Adding Warren would help upgrade the TE spot and give them the ability to add around an estimated 80 yards of production per game.  The Bears have D'Andre Swift at RB, but could use a RB to pair with him for a desired 2 RB attack.  So if I am Da Bears, I stay at 10 and take Warren.  If the Jags want to move on from Etienne, then they will take Jeanty. I think, if I were the Jags (with 10 picks this year) I would take Mason Graham and not try to get an 11th pick.  It is a need position, and it seems to me the only reason they are toying with the idea of moving on from Etienne is because Jeanty is on the board.  That, to me, would be a luxury pick. New GM, I think he does not get cute--they take Graham if they stay at 5.  I might say the Jags' biggest need is Corner.  #5 is too rich for Will Johnson, but remember, they have 10 picks.  could they move up with Cleveland and take Hunter, giving them a CB and WR threat?  To me, with the draft capital they have, that is the move they should make.  Cleveland then could move back to #5.  Remember, Nick Chubb is an aging (29) free agent coming off an injury--so he is gone.  With an additional second rounder, the Browns move back and take Jeanty to give Flacco a running game. The Jags pick is very interesting, but I would not be surprised to see them move up. 
×
×
  • Create New...