Devin White... Micah Parsons

[musicman]

If we don't like the QB's left at #8, would you take MLB Micah arsons? After watching Devin White last night change the momentum, makes me wonder having someone close to Luke's ability might help complete the defense turnaround? We need a general on defense. Still get a LT in the 2nd and a CB in the 3rd. 

I'm not pushing for Parsons, just saying watching White reminded me of Luke and the importance of a great MLB. Just wanting opinions. 

[CanadianCat]

He is a helluva a player. But if the team is taking a more analytical approach, positional value speaking, he is not worth it.

[ericr0319]

4 minutes ago, CanadianCat said:

He is a helluva a player. But if the team is taking a more analytical approach, positional value speaking, he is not worth it.

lol. i love when people post comments when they have zero clue. i mean do honestly have 0.1% of a clue what the team is thinking? 

[Growl]

No

[ericr0319]

8 minutes ago, musicman said:

If we don't like the QB's left at #8, would you take MLB Micah arsons? After watching Devin White last night change the momentum, makes me wonder having someone close to Luke's ability might help complete the defense turnaround? We need a general on defense. Still get a LT in the 2nd and a CB in the 3rd. 

I'm not pushing for Parsons, just saying watching White reminded me of Luke and the importance of a great MLB. Just wanting opinions. 

but to reply to your question, with my opinion, I believe if we do not go QB, and we stay at 8 - Micha has the most immediate impact at 8. that said, i think if we do not go QB we should trade down because we need multiple picks to rebuild our offensive line. 

[Waldo]

No QB at 8? Trade back.

[Growl]

1 minute ago, ericr0319 said:

lol. i love when people post comments when they have zero clue. i mean do honestly have 0.1% of a clue what the team is thinking? 

uh yeah, it's been pretty obvious

[CanadianCat]

Just now, ericr0319 said:

lol. i love when people post comments when they have zero clue. i mean do honestly have 0.1% of a clue what the team is thinking? 

gees man. Im stating the obvious. Im NOT saying they wont get him, but any amount of reading will show that at #8 an off the line LB is not the BEST value. Chill dude. 

[LinvilleGorge]

Please no. The Panthers have historically invested VERY heavily at MLB and we have an overall losing record to show for it. 

[45catfan]

11 minutes ago, musicman said:

If we don't like the QB's left at #8, would you take MLB Micah arsons? After watching Devin White last night change the momentum, makes me wonder having someone close to Luke's ability might help complete the defense turnaround? We need a general on defense. Still get a LT in the 2nd and a CB in the 3rd. 

I'm not pushing for Parsons, just saying watching White reminded me of Luke and the importance of a great MLB. Just wanting opinions. 

I'm for drafting a MLB, just not at #8.  Parsons is no Luke...very good, but not a generational-type talent.

[Rags]

I like Parsons a ton as yes good as a rusher too so he had more impact than most MLBs. Wouldn't be mad at the pick.

But eh. Would rather trade back. Secondary abd O-line are a much bigger need than MLB. Shaq and JCJ are solid enough and theres some decent LBs on the market and in the draft.

[pantherj]

If the bpa at 8 is a Lb then you look for a trade partner. We already have an expensive 1st pick LB with great athleticism. You don't win today collecting top quality LBs. They don't effect the game enough to matter, the ball is tossed over their head down field, and to make matters worse Parsons is not good at defending the pass, so we'd get wrecked. No more bad decisions. We need to build up our passing attack in the draft until we are a dominant passing team. A LB can be added later in the draft if needed (P.S not needed).

[DeSim]

16 minutes ago, ericr0319 said:

lol. i love when people post comments when they have zero clue. i mean do honestly have 0.1% of a clue what the team is thinking? 

To his defense, he never stated that he knew what the team is thinking...that’s why he said “if”. 

[ericr0319]

15 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

I'm for drafting a MLB, just not at #8.  Parsons is no Luke...very good, but not a generational-type talent.

8 is no mans land in the draft. its one of those spots where most players are not a value pick, but then the TOP guys if they fall to 8 is like a question mark...8 is seems like a spot you either trade up from or a trade back to a team that once to trade up to land a guy we made not need. 

i see at 8 a lot of teams wanting to nab a WR that we dont need