Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Speaking of Dan Morgan and Fitterer...


blueandblackattack
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Hadn't thought about that.

Morgan and Kuechly in the same front office? That's intriguing.

Right? It's like if the Spiderverse was the Pantherverse!

Spider-Man Movie GIF by Spider-Man: Into The Spider-Verse

 

I hadn't considered it either because I thought Directors and Assistant GM's were kinda along the same level, so it wouldn't be a bump up for him. But if it does, then come on down!

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, blueandblackattack said:

Right? It's like if the Spiderverse was the Pantherverse!

I hadn't considered it either because I thought Directors and Assistant GM's were kinda along the same level, so it wouldn't be a bump up for him. But if it does, then come on down!

Assistant GM would be a promotion for Morgan.

Teams were able to refuse us permission to interview guys last year because we weren't offering a position that included roster control.

The NFL changed some of those rules for this year because the Patriots kept screwing guys like Nick Caserio and Monti Ossenfort out of better opportunities, but I don't know if those changes would affect this sort of thing or not.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yeah injuries aside Morgan, Beason, and Kuechly were all HOF talents.

We were spoiled with such great HOF level MLB play from 2001-2019. 
Incredible to have drafted these guys. 
Seefart was a terrible Panthers coach but he left us Dan Morgan, Kris Jenkins and #89. Arguably 2 HOF talents. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Because being a pauper in the NFL is still making a king's ransom. NFL vet min is roughly 18x the median salary in the U.S.
    • At some point I sense it's gonna create some hate and locker room cancer between these cap hogs and the rest of the players. When the top 6 or 7 players take 80% of the cap, the other 40 plus guys are gonna get pissed off, especially when they're still only winning 5 or 6 games. Why put everything on the line to play with guys who are only in it for themselves? 
    • I am just spitballing here--let it play out and I will go to bed: Let's say Mahome's contract comes due and he insists on $100m per season.  Is there a team that would find the money to pay it?  Would KC? It was in 2015 (I think) when Cam was getting $20m and it was hard to grasp.  In the past decade, the price of a franchise QB has tripled.  Then the next QB bases his contract on the Mahomes deal.  The trend has been the last QB contract is the highest.  I see nothing to discourage that trend--Greed can destroy a league.  Personally, I don't watch baseball any more, and the NBA has a small group of about 8 teams that appear on national TV and they have players who make more than some eastern block countries.  Ticket prices go up---and we are headed for pay-per-view very soon across the board-
×
×
  • Create New...