Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Seattle and Carolina Records and Draft Orders: A comparison


CarolinaSunday

Recommended Posts

@Mr. Scot and I were discussing the comparisons of records and draft orders in one of the Fitterer threads.  He found the Seahawks' record for the past ten years, and I filled it out with what draft position the Seahawks had (BEFORE they traded down) and Carolina's record/draft position.

This might bring some perspective to the Seahawks drafts and how well they have been putting their team together:

image.png.0a698cac00c21b003f7cfeb05ec96773.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, WarHeel said:

So we’ve been in contention maybe 2 years with grossly half of our picks being in the Marty’s our GM zone while the Seahawks have had continued success year in and year out despite not having any Marty’s our GM zone picks.

Fixed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, WarHeel said:

So we’ve been in contention maybe 2 years with grossly half of our picks being in the top 10 while the Seahawks have had continued success year in and year out despite not having any top 10 picks.

It's amazing what having a franchise quarterback will do for you.

image.png.c37526a76d668f5e1d1088812a0ca266.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, trueblade said:

Cam was a franchise QB. He took  a little longer to get going than Russ, but Prime Cam of '13 through '17 had us right there with Seattle picking in the 20s. Expect for 2016.

Or if you look at that you see that maybe a particular GM was really bad at assembling an entire roster. Franchise QBs are great, but it takes a team to win it all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, WarHeel said:

So we’ve been in contention maybe 2 years with grossly half of our picks being in the top 10 while the Seahawks have had continued success year in and year out despite not having any top 10 picks.

frustrated jason segel GIF by NETFLIX

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Or if you look at that you see that maybe a particular GM was really bad at assembling an entire roster. Franchise QBs are great, but it takes a team to win it all. 

A better GM here might have helped sure. My main point is Seattle went from consistent 7-9 seasons to drafting the 20s once they got Russel Wilson. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...