Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers GM candidate Ed Dodds now available for hire


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Just now, Harbingers said:

It sounds like he wants more control than most legit GM's are willing to give, though.

IMO, coaches need a good deal of control as they are tasked with winning with the players. To me, it’s more about finding the right partner to collaborate with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Compliancy in this business is not good. We nailed 2020's draft but if we don't follow it with another good draft and another one after that it won't matter what 2020 did for us.

I still like Peters but Dodd seems to be the other side of the same coin.  If you flip it you still are going to get what you want.  

I think, among other things, that was a fault of Hurney.  You'd hear how good our scouting team was but each season our draft was mediocre to bad.  Maybe doing well once every 4 or 5 season.

Whether Peters or Dodd as long as they bring some consistency to our drafts.  Then when we have a player like Samuel possibly leaving us we have the answer already on the roster.  Truly On the Roster. 

Complacency is bad too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...