Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers GM candidate Ed Dodds now available for hire


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Said it before, but it speaks well of us that Dodds agreed to interview.

He declined to interview with the Browns last year because he didn't feel like he was ready. He added that you generally only get one chance to do something like this and if he was gonna do it, he absolutely wanted to hit it out of the park.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TSLA said:

I don’t know anything but the Colts draft in recent years have been very average to bad, other than hitting on Nelson and Leonard. 

Pittman Jr, Taylor and Blackmon were all starters and played well from this year’s draft. They were drafted in the 2nd/3rd. They didn’t have a first or maybe they traded down, not sure.

They also had a few more players than Leonard and Nelson in 2018. Hines was a 4th rounder and he’s got over 2100 yards in 3 years. Braden Smith has started 3 years at T.

Their 2019 draft was meh, just role players but both 2018 and 2020 drafts got at least 3 solid starters and some role players. Those are good drafts. Coming away with 2 good starting OL, a solid WR, a solid duo of RBs, a stud LB, a starting safety and a bunch of backups is a nice haul in 2 drafts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Pittman Jr, Taylor and Blackmon were all starters and played well from this year’s draft. They were drafted in the 2nd/3rd. They didn’t have a first or maybe they traded down, not sure.

They also had a few more players than Leonard and Nelson in 2018. Hines was a 4th rounder and he’s got over 2100 yards in 3 years. Braden Smith has started 3 years at T.

Their 2019 draft was meh, just role players but both 2018 and 2020 drafts got at least 3 solid starters and some role players. Those are good drafts. Coming away with 2 good starting OL, a solid WR, a solid duo of RBs, a stud LB, a starting safety and a bunch of backups is a nice haul in 2 drafts.

Traded their 2020 1st for Deforrest Buckner. I’d call that a win as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, TSLA said:

I don’t know anything but the Colts draft in recent years have been very average to bad, other than hitting on Nelson and Leonard. 

He was also a major influence in Seatle during 2007-2016 seasons, leading to 2 superbowls and helped draft wilson and the legion of boom.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Pittman Jr, Taylor and Blackmon were all starters and played well from this year’s draft. They were drafted in the 2nd/3rd. They didn’t have a first or maybe they traded down, not sure.

They also had a few more players than Leonard and Nelson in 2018. Hines was a 4th rounder and he’s got over 2100 yards in 3 years. Braden Smith has started 3 years at T.

Their 2019 draft was meh, just role players but both 2018 and 2020 drafts got at least 3 solid starters and some role players. Those are good drafts. Coming away with 2 good starting OL, a solid WR, a solid duo of RBs, a stud LB, a starting safety and a bunch of backups is a nice haul in 2 drafts.

Paris Campbell has some talent also, though injuries have derailed the start of his career. I wouldn't count him out just yet!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...