Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hypothetical Trade for Deshaun Watson


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Nope. He wants out. They can take Ted, our 1st and next years 2nd. They can draft a new QB with that pick and do what we should do at that price.

I don't see it happening. Maybe if it goes terrible for them and us, we see him next offseason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a heart beat. One of the positives that we have going is that we are still rebuilding and there is a good chance that the 2022 1st could still be top 15 as opposed to Pitt, NE, San Fran, or New Orleans which would all be pick 24 on up.

I would hope the Texans find that spicer than the other hypothetical spots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's another hypothetical:

PANTHERS GET:

Patrick Mahomes

CHIEFS GET:

Teddy Bridgewater, 2021 No. 8 overall pick, 2021 second-round pick, 2021 third-round pick, 2022 first-round pick, 2022 second-round pick, 2023 third-round pick

 

 

Both "hypotheticals" are equally likely of happening

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
    • I’m hoping SMU messes it all up and wins out. Imagine the SEC & BI0 would crap themselves trying to “fix” the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...