Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

With all of the GMs that have been interviewed


frash.exe

Recommended Posts

It's going to be Samir Suleiman. He is cap management at its finest/most brutal. He is in line and knows the organization. He has experience and has the best and most unbiased view. He was brought in directly by David Tepper. He even fulfills the minority candidate rules.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, NAS said:

Starting to think Tepper has no clue what he wants in a GM. Cast such a wide net and don’t seem to be any closer to making a decision 

Hell I'd be fine with them interviewing 100 people. Being thorough is a bad thing now? I'd much rather they do their due diligence and come away with the best candidate from a big pool than put on blinders and hone in on someone that might be a lesser candidate than an under the radar guy they ignored. Isn't that part of how we ended up with Hurney again? Felt like our interview process was a complete sham then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am announcing interest in Gm position too.  Policies

1. No overpaying vets/ next year’s draft picks off the table - no cap/draft hell possible

2. No drafting projects before 5th round.  We will assume college stats are reflection of ability first and foremost

3. Winning culture above all - no throwing games or even letting foot off the gas, play to kill 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Peon Awesome said:

Hell I'd be fine with them interviewing 100 people. Being thorough is a bad thing now? I'd much rather they do their due diligence and come away with the best candidate from a big pool than put on blinders and hone in on someone that might be a lesser candidate than an under the radar guy they ignored. Isn't that part of how we ended up with Hurney again? Felt like our interview process was a complete sham then.

that’s because it absolutely was a sham

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, frash.exe said:

that’s because it absolutely was a sham

Richardson could have (some say would have) just left the interim tag on Marty forever. He wouldn't have had to interview anybody else.

But then the Fritz Pollard Alliance got pissed off at Richardson thumbing his nose at the Rooney Rule. So the Panthers interviewed three minority candidates and then  handed the job to Hurney.

Couldda had Lake Dawson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Richardson could have (some say would have) just left the interim tag on Marty forever. He wouldn't have had to interview anybody else.

But then the Fritz Pollard Alliance got pissed off at Richardson thumbing his nose at the Rooney Rule. So the Panthers interviewed three minority candidates and then  handed the job to Hurney.

Couldda had Lake Dawson.

all for the sake of procedure

but you couldn’t say that on here without ppl @ing you trying to legitimize it with a 2500-word essay on why jeff otah was actually a great pick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, frash.exe said:

all for the sake of procedure

but you couldn’t say that on here without ppl @ing you trying to legitimize it with a 2500-word essay on why jeff otah was actually a great pick

Well luckily, that kinda stuff doesn't matter anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...