Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Updated GM Update


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

CBS' Jason La Canfora reports Vikings assistant GM George Paton has interviewed for the Lions' GM vacancy and will also speak to the Broncos. 

Paton has apparently already spoken with the Panthers and "withdrawn from the search." An annual general manager candidate, Paton seemed close to landing the Browns' job last season before withdrawing from that search, as well. Paton has now been with the Vikings for over 14 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Look in the article. It's confirmed they interviewed him yesterday.

I thought it was the same article and not updated. Shocked they didnt name him GM already, thought after they interviewed their "guy" they'd stop and just name him. I think Tepper is data collecting- "How would you fix the panthers team and scouting department???.... yes in details"..........end recording Tepper "Thanks for your time, we'll be in touch"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Waldo said:

You just described scouts, which every team has a room full of. So you think we should just have one or two?

I mean, there’s a reason why individual scouts are assigned to individual regions - so there aren’t multiple scouts/talent evaluators giving you contradicting reports on the same prospects. My point is, I’ll take quality over quantity when it comes to talent evaluation. My “one or two evaluators” comment has more to do with the high level people who are going to be comprising the draft board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Have said before, if I'm looking at making a financial decision, I'd absolutely ask David Tepper.

If it's a football decision though, I'd much rather talk to Matt Rhule.

Given the an acknowledged organizational commitment to "analytics" ---  how would you describe the difference/s in the decision making process between the two?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

I mean, there’s a reason why individual scouts are assigned to individual regions - so there aren’t multiple scouts/talent evaluators giving you contradicting reports on the same prospects. My point is, I’ll take quality over quantity when it comes to talent evaluation. My “one or two evaluators” comment has more to do with the high level people who are going to be comprising the draft board.

At some point all these guys are talking about prospects. I want a guy who knows talent extremely well over them. It shouldn't  be a compromise but a contribution.

Talent evaluation vs cap skills, I'm going the former every time unless we change the structure of the front office.

And Rhule did say thats what he wants and it would help him.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Clearly not as blown away by a candidate as they were by Rhule last year.

I would think it's easier to make the leap when you have nothing vs pairing to a guy with Rhule's contract.

Then again Hurney was in the room and we all know how he rolled...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Waldo said:

I would think it's easier to make the leap when you have nothing vs pairing to a guy with Rhule's contract.

Then again Hurney was in the room and we all know how he rolled...

Gotta admit it gives me a chuckle to know that he actively stumped for the guy who ended up getting him pushed out the door.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...