Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

News on Joe Brady

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

thefuzz Mentor

thefuzz

Posted
Posted
38 minutes ago, Rocky Davis said:

I mean if one only cares about the $$$ and possibility of never being an NFL HC again, then I agree. 

How many times has Chud's name come up for a HC job since that Browns debacle?

True.

The Jason Garrett's, Norv Turners, Adam Gase's, etc...rarely get 2nd chances in the NFL......

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

True.

The Jason Garrett's, Norv Turners, Adam Gase's, etc...rarely get 2nd chances in the NFL......

Heck, just look at Carolina.

Capers, Seifert, Fox, Rivera.  I mean, literally every NFL coach.   As long as you have some success and aren't a trainwreck….NFL HCs generally get more than one shot.  But you got to have some success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Woodie Newbie

Woodie

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

 

This is probably the team that worries me the most.  They are at least a couple of years away from even starting a real re-build.  O'Brien really put them in a big hole. They are also probably one of, if not the, least appealing jobs available, despite having Watson, because of their horrible cap situation and lack of draft capital, not to mention Easterby having so much power.

They'll probably have to go with a young guy without the huge resume and develop him for when they are ready to start building.  I can't see a top candidate looking at that situation and saying "wow, now this is appealing."  But for a young guy like Brady, it's perfect.  He has a top QB on a long-term contract to work with, and low expectations for the first couple of years, so the pressure won't be huge and he'll have time to grow.

Atlanta probably has too many pieces already in place and will want a more experienced guy who is ready now to hit the ground running.  And the Chargers probably have one of the best situations available with a QB in place with playmakers and several top defenders coming back next year.  All they really need is an improved OL to be a playoff team.  So, while they're taking a look, they will most likely end up with one of the top candidates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
thefuzz Mentor

thefuzz

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Rocky Davis said:

All of the above mentioned were offensive coordinators more than a YEAR in the NFL.

What's that got to do with the price of rice in China?

Brady is a young, up and coming offensive mind who has studied under Sean Payton, produced three 1,000 yard receivers with Teddy B as his QB, and helped guide LSU to one of the most productive college seasons all time.

The point, you take the money.  The NFL continues to just hire and rehire over and over.  He will have a job in the league as long as he wants it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
thefuzz Mentor

thefuzz

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, CRA said:

Heck, just look at Carolina.

Capers, Seifert, Fox, Rivera.  I mean, literally every NFL coach.   As long as you have some success and aren't a trainwreck….NFL HCs generally get more than one shot.  But you got to have some success.

If you are a great offensive or defensive mind, you will continue to get jobs, even if you took a HC gig at the Bengals and it went up in flames, if you are good, you can work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rocky Davis Veteran

Rocky Davis

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, thefuzz said:

What's that got to do with the price of rice in China?

Brady is a young, up and coming offensive mind who has studied under Sean Payton, produced three 1,000 yard receivers with Teddy B as his QB, and helped guide LSU to one of the most productive college seasons all time.

The point, you take the money.  The NFL continues to just hire and rehire over and over.  He will have a job in the league as long as he wants it.

It reiterates my point that Brady doesn't want to find himself in a position where he has a very short resume of NFL experience and a terrible first HC gig.  That's what happened to Chud.

I don't think Brady is a "Chud," but I hope he wouldn't find himself in the same situation.  It's just something I would consider. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...