Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

News on Joe Brady

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

stbugs Grand Master

stbugs

Posted
Posted
47 minutes ago, Mage said:

Lol no good coordinators would ever sign with this team if this kind of stuff was a thing.

I don’t think you can. From what I recall, you cannot block an interview for any coach/GM if the new team is offering a level up once that team’s season is over. You can block interviews for a sideways move if still under contract. Kind of like poaching a PS player. If you put them on your active 53, the other team loses the player regardless of contract. Not sure if that is just the way all coach/GM contracts are written (and no agent will go away from) or if it’s setup like that in the CBA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stbugs Grand Master

stbugs

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'd rather have coordinators that are very good at their jobs but either don't care about being head coaches or have already been head coaches and don't need to be again.

That kind doesn't exactly grow on trees though.

We’ve got one of those on D. In a way I don’t really care if Brady leaves. Would We rather have a new not quite hot for HC OC with a rookie QB or have Brady for another year and then rookie QB gets another OC his second or third year? I hadn’t really thought about it but it would be good to get the stability when you draft a QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
3 minutes ago, stbugs said:

We’ve got one of those on D. In a way I don’t really care if Brady leaves. Would We rather have a new not quite hot for HC OC with a rookie QB or have Brady for another year and then rookie QB gets another OC his second or third year? I hadn’t really thought about it but it would be good to get the stability when you draft a QB.

I'm not completely sold on Phil Snow yet but I'll grant that it's possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted

I getting close to just release Joe Brady. If hes not gone this year, for sure gone next. You can not bring a young QB this year in and one year later hes got a new OC. Thats impends a young QB progress, so this lava hot Brady fellow just needs a head start. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted

Cant put Bridgewater on Brady.  TB could have come in and done well--he did OK for a bit, but then there were a few injuries in areas where we were already weak--LT, LG, RB, etc.  He had no TE because Thomas never stepped up.  He had to develop chemistry with Moore, Samuel.

So I agree that TB is not the QB here, but when you considered the QB situation, he was a good gamble.  Brady did not give TB $63m--

TB was chosen when there were not many options.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panther'sBigD Mentor

Panther'sBigD

Posted
Posted

I think he stays. If he takes the money and runs, then he's not as sharp as I thought he was. Sure the millions are great, but he could have made millions at LSU very shortly. I believe he's smart enough to know he's not quite ready and that flaming out this early could set him back farther than waiting a year or two to gain some experience under a guy like Rhule. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...