Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Draft Network Mock Draft(Panthers Trade up to 3)


kungfoodude

Recommended Posts

https://thedraftnetwork.com/articles/2021-nfl-mock-draft-marino-4.0

Quote

TRADE: Carolina receives 3rd overall pick from Miami in exchange for 8th overall pick, 72nd overall pick, 2022 first-round pick.

The Panthers showed some promise in Year 1 of the Matt Rhule era and the next phase of the rebuilding process for Carolina is finding its next franchise quarterback. In striking distance to land an exciting new option, the Panthers should be thinking about a move up the board. With Miami being only one year removed from drafting Tua Tagovailoa with the No. 5 overall selection and earning the No. 3 pick courtesy of the Laremy Tunsil trade and a poor season from the Texans, trading back to build the talent around Tagovailoa is a wise move. The Dolphins and Panthers are perfect trade partners. Wilson is a dynamic quarterback prospect that fits nicely with how the NFL game is trending and would provide Carolina with a potential difference-maker at the position. With a fairly complete set of weapons already in place and all the investments made on the defensive side of the football, Carolina is ready to pick a quarterback high in the draft.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Panthercougar68 said:

Honestly I think you could get away with 2021 #8 and #40 to make that trade and now worry about 2022.

100% disagree. There are going to be a lot of teams gunning for that pick and a future 1st will be a bare minimum. 

Denver, San Francisco, New England, Detroit, Washington, Chicago are all candidates to trade up, IMO. There are so many QB needy teams and this is a very, very valuable draft to snag a QB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, FuFuLamePoo said:

We really don't need a new thread for every new mock draft that gets released

Yeah, because we need more threads about Teddy's post game comments or every new GM candidate. 

It's the offseason, I suggest you hibernate if you don't want to see reach threads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The Huddler said:

If its for our franchise guy who will win SBs, then its worth it.

 

kinda annoying beating Washington cost us a 1st round pick .. 

I think a lot is going to depend on how all these QB evaluations pan out. There is a pretty big pool of first round caliber QB's(Lawrence, Fields, Wilson, Lance, Jones, Trask). Does a guy like Wilson or Lance fall? Does Fields fall? Does Jones shoot up the boards? 

It's really tough to say at the moment. These boards are 98% pure speculation and less about actual in depth evaluation and mining team sources. I will say that TDN does some of the best prospect evaluation around, IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

If its for our franchise guy who will win SBs, then its worth it.

 

kinda annoying beating Washington cost us a 1st round pick .. 

Yep, the same people who didn’t want us to tank might be ok with trading up. There’s a reason why us tankers didn’t want to win any games. Wouldn’t it be nice to have pick 3 already and also be able to keep pick 72 and 2021 first? I mean if we were playoff teams already like KC and Houston were, trading a future first to get the one piece (QB) you needed isn’t a bad trade off, especially when you feel that future first will be a late first. I don’t think our 2021 pick will be a late first so honestly I don’t want to trade up unless we can get Fields or Wilson and we feel like they are our new healthy Cam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think, under the right circumstances, KC would be the team with the most desperate offer.  Do we want to go from 8 to 31, no, but it would give us 2 extra day 2 picks and a future high pick.  And yes, it would be a huge risk for Morgan.  The only way I see it is the Chiefs added a player at a need position and some day 2 picks and possibly a first in 2026.  Desperate, but the Chiefs are in win now made and their OL was just exposed, which is exactly what the Kendrick Lamar halftime show was about. 
    • He said himself in his interviews today that he is more of a chess piece to move around and mentioned he's been working a lot with Nolan Smith jr.
    • Here is how we move back:  First, Offensive tackle is not good in free agency.  The Draft: The Jets need a LT.  Will Campbell is the consensus best Tackle in the draft, and they take him.  All those other teams (I count 6-8 who need a T--and I see KC STARVING for one after the Super Bowl) decide they need to move up to get the best pure LT in the draft, Kelvin Banks out of Texas.  After Banks and Campbell, there is a pretty sharp drop in talent level, dropping from A players to B players. The next two OTs are Right Tackles, so anyone needing a LT would have to hope the fifth overall OT, Wyatt Milum (arguably) would be there at the end of the first round.  Knowing that so many bidders are doing the same thing and they all have phones, I honestly think that Campbell or Banks is there when the Panthers pick and the phone will be ringing.  If they both go before the Panthers pick, crickets.  Here is the Math: Likely to be gone when Panthers pick: Ward, QB Carter, Edge Sanders, QB Graham, DL Hunter, WR/CB Likely to be available when Panthers pick:  There are 2 picks before the Panthers pick once those five get gone.  Among those are these players: McMillan WR Johnson, CB Will Campbell, OT James Pearce, Edge Javon Walker, Superhero.  If we only had 10 more.  (LB) Kelvin Banks, OT Now, if I am a GM on a team that needs an OT, I feel fairly strong that an OT is not going in the top 5.  I am working on potential trades for the seventh and eighth picks, ready to make a deal as soon as Campbell or Banks goes off the board. The Raiders pick 6th--they have needs at OT, WR, and CB if you assume they sign a QB in free agency; I think Darnold goes there, personally.   Regardless, there are no QBs worth #7 overall (unless Sanders falls), so they will draft an OT or CB--in my view,.  They are going to shop in free agency with a lot of $$$.  I am guessing they get their CB then.  the Raiders' will likely draft OT Campbell, but do not rule out TMac:   Biggest Weaknesses: Quarterback Offensive Tackle Cornerback Wide Receiver Running Back The Jets pick 8th.  Of course, their phone will be ringing off the hook for Banks if this happens, and the Jets have many needs now that Rodgers and Adams are gone.  While they too need an OT, they have more pressing needs as well.  Edge rusher is their biggest need listed here after QB, but their defense was ranked #3 in the NFL last year (I was surprised).  Their offense was ranked 23rd.  They will be focused on revamping the Offense with the losses of Rodgers and Adams.  I see them taking a T or Tmac.  Biggest Weaknesses: Quarterback Edge-Rusher Wide Receiver Safety Interior Defensive Line Offensive Tackle In this scenario, the only ways the Panthers can trade back is: 1. If the Raiders do not take an OT and the Jets do. 2. If the Jets refuse trade offers and take the best available edge or WR at #7. 3. Both OTs are gone and a team wants the best CB or WR in the draft and is willing trade up.  I do not see a lot of depth in this draft at CB or #1 WR.  What may cause the Panthers to stay put and pick:  1. Edge.  They see Pearce or Green as part of the second-tier edges and need one of them. 2. They like TMac and see the offense taking the next step with him, knowing they can address IDL in round 2 and have Clowney and Wonnum for another season.  3.  The do not re-sign Mike Jax and need an outside CB and have the chance to draft Johnson to pair with Horn.  4.  They fall in love with Walker and Evero develops a boner on how to use him properly.  From this perspective, I would give the chance of trade back slightly under 50% I would speculate that if we draft, we take Pearce, Johnson, or McMillan.  I do not see Walker being a good fit here, but I understand why some of you like him.
×
×
  • Create New...