How much you willing to trade for a QB

[Jmac]

Picking #8 and who knows who will be available. Should they have a plan B to either trade up or a trade for a established QB if no one is avaiable. What do you think would be the best option if they really want a QB this year. 

[t96]

Trading for an established QB makes no sense for us. None could be true long term options (unless a Watson type was available, but he’s not...) and with Teddy already eating cap the next 2 years it just wouldn’t work. Needs to be a rookie QB.

[kungfoodude]

2 minutes ago, Jmac said:

Picking #8 and who knows who will be available. Should they have a plan B to either trade up or a trade for a established QB if no one is avaiable. What do you think would be the best option if they really want a QB this year. 

You are asking a very vague question. What QB are we trading for, either in the NFL or in the draft? What do you mean by "decent" QB? Teddy is a "decent" QB. Why would I make a lateral move?

[WarPanthers89]

I wouldn’t be even remotely upset trading away a future 1st to get our guy (IN THE DRAFT) if we get a franchise QB. I don’t expect to be picking in the top 10 next season and that is the one position you never regret trading for if you get your guy. You cannot win consistently in today’s NFL without a franchise QB. No way we trade for another vet QB. We cannot afford the 20 million owed to Teddy along with someone else

[Beerfacedlegend]

To be honest trading for a rookie is a bad investment. You don’t know what you are getting in return . I’d trade a 4th or 5th for Carson wentz 

 

edit I take that back wentz salary is insane they will have to cut him 

[top dawg]

I don't like the idea of trading away draft capital, especially a king's ransom for the "next big thing!" 

If we can get a vet, let us sign a free agent or trade a late day three pick if that's how we want to go.

[Jmac]

9 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

You are asking a very vague question. What QB are we trading for, either in the NFL or in the draft? What do you mean by "decent" QB? Teddy is a "decent" QB. Why would I make a lateral move?

Fixed it

[Panthercougar68]

I would have no qualms with trading for Stafford if he hits the market. I don’t think he would command a first but probably a 2nd and 3rd. Then again Sam Bradford garnered a 1st so idk.

I can see a world where Elway trades for Stafford and offers up Drew Lock.

[kungfoodude]

3 minutes ago, Beerfacedlegend said:

To be honest trading for a rookie is a bad investment. You don’t know what you are getting in return . I’d trade a 4th or 5th for Carson wentz 

 

edit I take that back wentz salary is insane they will have to cut him 

The rumor mill says that the impending Wentz trade likely involves restructuring his contract.

[saX man]

Maybe Derek Carr or in the draft for Zach Wilson at #3. 

From 8 to 3 would require a bit but could be worth it.  BUT college football isn't over, interested in that title game w/Mac.

[panthers55]

We will draft a QB this year. With the rookie salary cap it makes little sense not to. We will also bring in a vet to compete as backup as well. 

I don't want us to trade up at all given there is no real consensus best guy especially after Lawrence got exposed.  Seems we can find our franchise guy at 8. 

All that angst from the tankers and we still got a top 10 pick. Hundreds of post whining and bitching and we are still likely to get the third or fourth ranked QB which is not very different if we stayed at 3 given that there isn't consensus about we is the best despite all the Lawrence fans. Plus both Jacksonville and the Jets will pick a QB. 

[Rocky Davis]

I'd trade Teddy, Boston, and an All You Can Eat Card to Popeyes or Chick-Fil-A and our 2nd this year and 1st next.  /s

[saX man]

Just now, panthers55 said:

We will draft a QB this year. With the rookie salary cap it makes little sense not to. We will also bring in a vet to compete as backup as well. 

I don't want us to trade up at all given there is no real consensus best guy especially after Lawrence got exposed.  Seems we can find our franchise guy at 8. 

All that angst from the tankers and we still got a top 10 pick. Hundreds of post whining and bitching and we are still likely to get the third or fourth ranked QB which is not very different if we stayed at 3 given that there isn't consensus about we is the best despite all the Lawrence fans. Plus both Jacksonville and the Jets will pick a QB. 

Totally, the real question is how our new scouting crew will view Zach Wilson, Trey Lance & Mac Jones.  One of those three is our new QB.

[panthers55]

3 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

I would have no qualms with trading for Stafford if he hits the market. I don’t think he would command a first but probably a 2nd and 3rd. Then again Sam Bradford garnered a 1st so idk.

I can see a world where Elway trades for Stafford and offers up Drew Lock.

Given the salary cap contraction I expect a bunch of teams to be dumping high price vets.