Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carolina Panthers Free Agents


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, BIGH2001 said:

The talent level on this team is at an all time low.

Boy this is a doomer take if I've ever seen one.

Moore, CMC, Burns, Brown, Obada, Kerr, JCJ, Shaq, Chinn, and YGM. Hell even DJax finally seems to be buying in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep Moton no matter what, would love to keep Samuel but he will be overpaid by someone else, accept that and just take the 3rd round compensation pick for the following draft, don’t make any big free agency signings until the next offseason after our rookie QB has sat for a season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Butterflyj30 said:

Ehhh, he's kind of been saying that all year, so I don't think there's much to it.  That being said, the longer the season went on, he just looked like JAG and disappeared.  Rodney Smith looked more impressive to me and I would love to have him back.  I don't really care either way with Davis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RoaringRiot said:

Moton: 90% (probably franchise tag)

Samuel: 0% (he gone )

Feel bad about Samuel, finally found a system where he was a jack of all trades and a key piece and "he gone" feels bad man.  Is it Samuel doesn't want to be here or just $$$$$??

I suppose since he had a great year it makes him too expensive for us, take that 3rd round comp I suppose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Rocky Davis said:

Feel bad about Samuel, finally found a system where he was a jack of all trades and a key piece and "he gone" feels bad man.  Is it Samuel doesn't want to be here or just $$$$$??

I suppose since he had a great year it makes him too expensive for us, take that 3rd round comp I suppose.

I think it's a little of both. Samuel doesn't want to be the 4th option on a team (once CMC comes back). The Panthers know they need to upgrade TE too, so the need for a WR3 at that price tag doesn't make sense, especially when you're rebuilding and have a ton of holes to fill. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, RoaringRiot said:

Moton: 90% (probably franchise tag)

Samuel: 0% (he gone )

Appreciate it, as always, Zack.  Good to hear about Moton, but man, that sucks about Samuel.  I always believed in his potential, then it seems like it all finally comes together and he's gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...