Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carolina Panthers Free Agents


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Who do we keep?

 

UNRESTRICTED FREE AGENTS

FB Alex Armah

WR Pharoh Cooper

RB Mike Davis

CB Rasul Douglas

CB Corn Elder

LS J.J. Jansen

C Tyler Larsen

TE Chris Manhertz

G John Miller

T Taylor Moton

T Russell Okung

G Chris Reed

WR Curtis Samuel

OL Michael Schofield

LB Julian Stanford

LB Adarius Taylor

LB Tahir Whitehead

 

 

RESTRICTED FREE AGENTS

WR Keith Kirkwood

DE Efe Obada

T Trent Scott

WR Brandon Zylstra

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moton.

If possible, Obada, Samuel and Taylor (cheap backup). Couple others maybe as depth but maybe Okung and Davis get us a couple comp picks. Here’s to the team deciding we need to give the rookie a couple years and not sign expensive/comp pick cancelling FAs to maximize cap for extending Moore and Burns, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

Who do we keep?

 

UNRESTRICTED FREE AGENTS

FB Alex Armah

WR Pharoh Cooper

RB Mike Davis

CB Rasul Douglas

CB Corn Elder

LS J.J. Jansen

C Tyler Larsen

TE Chris Manhertz

G John Miller

T Taylor Moton

T Russell Okung

G Chris Reed

WR Curtis Samuel

OL Michael Schofield

LB Julian Stanford

LB Adarius Taylor

LB Tahir Whitehead

 

 

RESTRICTED FREE AGENTS

WR Keith Kirkwood

DE Efe Obada

T Trent Scott

WR Brandon Zylstra

The bolded are must keep in my eyes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

miller and reed aren't talked about enough. they've quietly solidified the interior line and helped make up for paradis's fugass pass blocking.

they aren't fantastic but if that trio is starting next year moton + a left tackle leaves us with only TE as a real hole on offense for whichever quarterback we draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...