Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How would Smitty do in a WCO?


PhillyB

Recommended Posts

Smitty will be good in any offense you put him in as long as you can feed him the ball.

He's a baller....plain and simple. Get him to him no matter how you have to do it, and he will make the plays.

I hate seeing him drown, and waste his career away here. I love the guy enough to know that this place is killing him, and enough is enough, and some of you people are going to go crazy when he walks away from it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Smitty will be good in any offense you put him in as long as you can feed him the ball.

He's a baller....plain and simple. Get him to him no matter how you have to do it, and he will make the plays.

I hate seeing him drown, and waste his career away here. I love the guy enough to know that this place is killing him, and enough is enough, and some of you people are going to go crazy when he walks away from it.

I almost was hoping we traded him before the deadline. He probably only has 2 or 3 years of peak skill left and he is being wasted with Jake as his QB and he knows it. Thats why he is pissed every time you see him. We will continue to imagine just how great he would have been with a Brady throwing to him his whole career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont wont a WCO..here..I like the Power running game..seeing the eagles game always reminds me why i hate a WCO..

I like the Heavy run WCO like in Minn or that was in Green Bay at one time. Its almost what we have here except its not as vertical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean it's not even like this was his worst game of the season... I'm not done with him by any means but this feels more the norm for him than the exception:/
    • I'd give it a C mainly because of Brooks.  If we just didn't have a 2nd I'd argue B to B+ tbh. Brooks was a bad gamble, tho one that could still pay off long term. Yes XL only has 400 yards but... Look who is throwing him the ball. And I think he isn't a "true #1" but he's been able to consistently get open. Hands definitely need to be cleaned up.  But he should end the year with 500-600 yards. Like you said - Sanders looks great.  Get him a better QB / more time with a QB and I think he's gonna impress. We added a couple rotational players on D that have both made plays and show promise for the future from later rounds. So I'd say, Brooks really hurts this drafts grade. It'll be interesting to see how it progresses over the next 3 years. I've overall really liked Morgan's FA acquisitions, so...
    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
×
×
  • Create New...