Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CFP Semifinals part deux: 3 Ohio State vs 2 Clemson 800 PM EST


Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Varking said:

He’s still going first overall. Teams and scouts aren’t going to panic like fans off of one game. 

There is oooooone interesting scenario on that front.

There's talk of Urban Meyer returning to coaching, and in the pros. Specifically, with the Jaguars.

Now, Meyer didn't coach Fields at Ohio State (Fields arrived the year following his retirement) but ya know... :thinking:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Yeah, it is debatable that Clemson is better next year with Trevor and Travis both gone.  Don't really agree there.

It’s about the rest of the team. It’s a younger defense, they have a stud running back behind Etienne and they have a monster QB ready to go, the receiving talent will be better next year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

Etienne and Goldilocks are leaving and u say Clempsin is going to be better next year? LOL

Yes. Because while two players are leaving the guys around them are going to be getting older and the people replacing those two are no joke. DJ is a stud. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Varking said:

It’s about the rest of the team. It’s a younger defense, they have a stud running back behind Etienne and they have a monster QB ready to go, the receiving talent will be better next year. 

Plenty of talent waiting in the wings, we agree there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

There is oooooone interesting scenario on that front.

There's talk of Urban Meyer returning to coaching, and in the pros. Specifically, with the Jaguars.

Now, Meyer didn't coach Fields at Ohio State (Fields arrived the year following his retirement) but ya know... :thinking:

He's Trent Blake's favorite it seems...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...