Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Patriots - Bills MNF thread


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Have you watched these two teams this season?

Cam and his receivers are equally atrocious.

But they have one of the better defenses and olines in the NFL.

And the #1 ranked special teams.

Plus of course superior coaching.

Could in fact be a close game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, onmyown said:

Cam and his receivers are equally atrocious.

But they have one of the better defenses and olines in the NFL.

And the #1 ranked special teams.

Plus of course superior coaching.

Could in fact be a close game.

No they don’t, they are atrocious as a run defense, they are currently ranked 23rd in dvoa on defense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Cpt slay a ho said:

Meyers is a diamond in the rough but the rest are serviceable wrs.

I think the pats take this game, they matchup well with the bills, no Gilmore but jc Jackson is just as good. 

Pats are sticking with cam even while out of contention that’s says something about that roster 
 

If i were you, i don't think I would place a money bet on that hunch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...