Curtis or Robbie?

[Waldo]

I'm interested to see Curtis' price. It might not be an option to keep him.

Anderson is solid, plays hard. Second half of the season really changed his value from must to should.

I wouldn't have a problem keeping both or getting value out of one if we can't afford both.

[shaqattaq]

Samuel:

Anderson:

Head to head comparison, I like Samuel a bit more. He wins every category except total yards. Do I eat $4M and cut Robby?? that seems like a bad idea.

[DaveThePanther2008]

24 minutes ago, BrizzMachete said:

I personally like Curtis better but it wouldn’t be smart to cut Robbie after what he showed this year . I wanna keep all 3 

Robbie had 3 100 yard games in the first 5 games we had this year.  He did not eclipse that afterwards.  Samuel is a dual threat and a huge target for 3rd down.  I'd take the cap hit and sign Samuel without a second thought.

[micnificent28]

23 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

There are a lot of dudes in this draft class that can be had in the 2nd and 3rd round that could replace Curtis for a fraction of the cost. Curtis at this point might be a luxury we can’t afford given our other needs.

That isn't true at all. Your assuming you can just plug any 2nd round pick in and that will get you curtis. Curtis is a rare piece that can do it all. 1k players with legit 4.31 speed that can play don't grow on trees.

[micnificent28]

I personally never wanted Anderson because I saw what Samuel could be. The huddle bagged on him for years now that he has developed hes everyone's favorite wr.

[TheCasillas]

8 minutes ago, shaqattaq said:

Samuel:

Anderson:

Head to head comparison, I like Samuel a bit more. He wins every category except total yards. Do I eat $4M and cut Robbie?? that seems like a bad idea.

Samuel and Robbie played two different positions on this offense. We saw Samuel last year in the flanker role, it didnt work out. 

[PhillyB]

if CMC plays samuel is the one that loses snaps. easy choice 

[micnificent28]

1 minute ago, PhillyB said:

if CMC plays samuel is the one that loses snaps. easy choice 

Not really. Could be a balance of both. Maybe more Samuel leads to a healthier cmc. Not like Samuel is getting more than 3 carries a game anyway.  A good team doesn't throw away good players because of snaps and targets.

[*FreeFua*]

18 minutes ago, micnificent28 said:

That isn't true at all. Your assuming you can just plug any 2nd round pick in and that will get you curtis. Curtis is a rare piece that can do it all. 1k players with legit 4.31 speed that can play don't grow on trees.

Ok.

[*FreeFua*]

31 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

I'd take the cap hit and sign Samuel without a second thought.

Ok Hurney

[45catfan]

53 minutes ago, WarHeel said:

I like Curtis for his multitude of options. Not discrediting Anderson but I feel like the early success he and Bridgewater had was not as pronounced as the season progressed. 

Anderson hit the gate like gangbusters over the first 4 of 5 games and since has yet to produce any another 100 yard games.   A FA guy in a new system gave Robbie an early advantage, but opposing teams have gotten a bead on him now.  Curtis keeps getting better every year.  I hate to develop a player and then let him walk.  I hope Samuel doesn't get greedy.

[theinstrumental]

How many threads do we need where we make this false choice? If we can sign Samuel at a reasonable price, then we keep him. Teams start three wide receivers now. We have three good ones. Keep them all. 

[DaveThePanther2008]

29 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

Ok Hurney

Anderson isn't nearly as valuable as Samuel and it's not even close.

[WarHeel]

31 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Anderson hit the gate like gangbusters over the first 4 of 5 games and since has yet to produce any another 100 yard games.   A FA guy in a new system gave Robbie an early advantage, but opposing teams have gotten a bead on him now.  Curtis keeps getting better every year.  I hate to develop a player and then let him walk.  I hope Samuel doesn't get greedy.

This is spot on.