Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule may have had a part in this


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Kyle Bailey was talking about a Zoom call that David Tepper had with members of the media this morning.

Tepper reportedly said that he and Marty mutually agreed that it was time to move on (yeah, sure).

But he also mentioned something along the lines of wanting to see better collaboration between the GM and the head coach, and apparently made some similar statements that indicated Matt Rhule and Marty Hurney might not have exactly been on the same page.

Makes ya wonder...

Mind you, Rhule has always spoken publicly about working well with Marty.

Of course, he also said he couldn't wait to work with Cam Newton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

Marty: So with our top 5 pick we're gonna pick the best off the ball linebacker available, also, we need to sign Mike Davis to a 7 year deal.

Rhule: lol, GTFO

Nice. would have been better if you criticized his rd. 2-5 picks and not his first round.  Also, a position that Hurney is not good at picking. Hurney knows his LBs. 

You'll get em next time tiger!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Proudiddy said:

That really doesn't excite me, especially if Rhule was one of the main proponents responsible for signing Bridgewater to a 3 year/60M deal.

He was via Brady. Yes. I dont think he's sold on Bridgewater though, but I also dont think we take a QB this draft. Probably next year. Hopefully that UNC kid. That dude is going to be good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Proudiddy said:

That really doesn't excite me, especially if Rhule was one of the main proponents responsible for signing Bridgewater to a 3 year/60M deal.

We already knew Rhule wanted a "coach-centric" approach. I'm guessing Marty wasn't coach-centric enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Seems that Morgan and company really went heavy towards guys good against the run. In other words, targeting our biggest weakness in a league where pounding the rock is back in fashion. At least conceptually, these are sound moves. Really comes down to Evero being able to do something with all these pieces. We'll absolutely improve but by how much is up in the air. Worth noting this should help our offense by simply getting more opportunities to have the ball. Last season, we were the second worst in TOP, not good when it lacked explosive playmakers.
    • I don’t see what’s to like TBH. As someone posted about, spending in FA is easy. IOL was a problem because we ignored it in the draft, and we have solved (barring injury, depth is suspect) 2/3 of it with the 3rd highest paid RG and 9th highest paid LG. When you have the highest paid guard tandem, they better be good. Spending money on DL is obvious to do. Just like OL, that’s our weakness now. He’s done nothing special yet. Overspending is easy to do. Signing a Reddick or Luvu where your result is a great value, that’s special. Our 2024 draft has been very rough outside of Coker. Pick 8 and 57 better hit hard because signing FAs to be your core guys never works. The great team sign a FA or two to fill spots and use the bulk of their cap to extend their great draft picks.
    • Honestly it would not surprise ne
×
×
  • Create New...