very curious about the timing here. tepper's comments about having differences in approach - marty with a "traditional" approach and tepper more data-driven - make me wonder if bridgewater himself wasn't a fulcrum for hurney's future one way or another. could data analytics have suggested bridgewater was going to be forgettable? plenty here will tell you so. could hurney have chosen teddy as his hill to die on, betting the house on his approach and failing spectacularly? a mid-sea