Fields v. Wilson v. Lance v. Trask v. Jones

[GoobyPls]

I like Wilson, he’s seems like the most gifted passer of the remaining QBs, he has a lot Rodgers in him.

 

OSU scare me, they run a very qb friendly system 

[Dog Runner]

15 hours ago, qazsazsaz said:

Also Fields is a bad decision maker against better defenses. Watch his games.

Terrible decisions against both Indiana and Northwestern.

[Harbingers]

15 hours ago, saX man said:

Figured to just throw it out there. Cast your vote.

You left off Charlie Brewer, Why?

[trueblade]

I'd sell the farm for Trevor. I'd actually sell several farms for Trevor. After him, all these guys are a mystery bag. Maybe they are pro bowlers, maybe they're busts, but I couldn't begin to tell you which one is which.

[bobcat91]

I want Lawrence, but that's not happening. I just haven't seen much tape on Lance but small school guys scare me since lack of competition waters down their film. He also is less than a 50% passer. Fields looks like Dewayne Haskins. The accuracy and decision making are iffy. I like Wilson and see alot of Aaron Rogers in him. He would be my choice, but its a gamble on anyone outside of Lawrence 

[pantherj]

If Trey Lance comes into the combine with his mechanics fixed then he'll be the next Panthers QB imo.

[Verge]

17 hours ago, t96 said:

@Verge want to hear your thoughts and your friend's thoughts, though I'm sure we'll see a bunch of that closer to the draft.

My personal rankings right now 

1. Wilson 
2. Lance 
3. Fields 
4. Trask 
5. Jones 

 

[BrianS]

32 minutes ago, pantherj said:

If Trey Lance comes into the combine with his mechanics fixed then he'll be the next Panthers QB imo.

See?  There it is again.  People thinking they can fix mechanics.  I remember another physical specimen in a draft . . . "all we have to do is fix his throwing mechanics".  News flash:  By the time you hit the NFL, your mechanics are your mechanics.  You might make tiny improvements, but you're effectively set.  Either you have them or you don't.

If the Rivera / Shula / Hurney crowd was still in town, sure, I could see Lance being the choice.  But Rhule / Brady value completely different things in a QB.  They don't want or need a guy to run the read option or QB power.  Frankly, I'm glad.  Physical specimens and running QB's have a very limited shelf life in the NFL.  I'd rather see us draft a polished passer who can be the answer for 15 years.  Pretty sure that's how Rhule / Brady see it too.

[DaveThePanther2008]

17 hours ago, t96 said:

You don't over think this one, Fields is a no brainer #2 behind Trevor. Lance/Wilson a toss up then Trask/Jones late 1st and not in the discussion for us

I know you don't take one game as a full analysis but Fields looked overwhelmed against Northwestern.  I was not impressed.  I would not say it's a no brainer. 

[Kentucky Panther]

I have them tiered like this 

 

Fields

 

Wilson

Lance

 

Trask

Jones 

[t96]

6 minutes ago, Verge said:

My personal rankings right now 

1. Wilson 
2. Lance 
3. Fields 
4. Trask 
5. Jones 

 

Yeah the Wilson/Lance/Fields discussion is getting much much closer, and seeing a lot more of Wilson or Lance ahead of Fields than we did a few months back. I don't think you can go wrong with any of those 3 and who the fug really knows which will wind up being the best, but my thoughts on it are that Fields has just as much overall upside as the other 2 but has a better sample size. I'm really liking Wilson lately but his smaller stature concerns me a bit along with the competition he's played. 

 

Do you think it's fair to say Trask/Jones are pretty much unanimously in a tier below the other 3? Or could you see reasons with them that a team would rank either higher than any of your top 3?

[t96]

7 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

I know you don't take one game as a full analysis but Fields looked overwhelmed against Northwestern.  I was not impressed.  I would not say it's a no brainer. 

Concerning for sure, I just think overall Fields has as high of an upside as anyone, if not higher, plus he also has put more tape on film against better competition than the others. Lance and Wilson have similar upside but not quite as high of a floor, in my opinion. Can't really go wrong with any of the 3 and I wouldn't be upset if we had all 3 sitting there and took Wilson or Lance, but I would be completely shocked if Fields isn't the 2nd QB taken.

[Verge]

When I asked about comparisons the other day 

Zach Wilson = Bigger Kyler Murray 
Trey Lance = Cam Newton 
 

[Shocker]

1 minute ago, Verge said:

When I asked about comparisons the other day 

Zach Wilson = Bigger Kyler Murray 
Trey Lance = Cam Newton 
 

Sorry man, don't see it with either of those.