Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers coach Matt Rhule doesn't expect Christian McCaffrey to play vs. Packers


Prowler2k18

Recommended Posts

From NFL.com


Christian McCaffrey's fight to return to game action likely won't see an end in Week 15.

Panthers coach Matt Rhule told reporters he does not think Christian McCaffrey will play Saturday against the Green Bay Packers, per the Associated Press' Steve Reed, due to shoulder and thigh issues. Rhule added his belief could change if McCaffrey can practice Wednesday, but as of Tuesday, the coach doesn't expect McCaffrey to play.

McCaffrey has missed the majority of the season due to injury, first to his ankle and now his current combination of ailments. McCaffrey has only played in three games, with his most recent outing coming in Week 9. Prior to that contest, McCaffrey played in Weeks 1 and 2 before suffering the ankle issue in a loss to Tampa Bay.

Carolina's offense has been forced to proceed without the star running back, who has ceded his place to Mike Davis. The backup has rushed for 555 yards and five touchdowns on 137 attempts in 13 games played (10 starts). As an offense, the Panthers rank 19th in yards per game, with the bulk of their production coming from their 15th-ranked passing offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Rhule has been talking like he still expects him to play at some point this season, but I'm not really sure that's gonna happen.

(and I won't be that upset if it doesn't)

I think they’re publicly holding out hope but with each passing week it appears unlikely. It’s too risky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, musicman said:

No, I actually think he needs to play, if anything to see if Teddy is better because of it. Does it really open up the offense? We need to know what we can do next year and with who. So him playing with give us a more accurate reading of that. 

We've seen plenty from Teddy to know he's not the long-term answer. Hell, he isn't even a decent stop gap 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, musicman said:

No, I actually think he needs to play, if anything to see if Teddy is better because of it. Does it really open up the offense? We need to know what we can do next year and with who. So him playing with give us a more accurate reading of that. 

Bridgewater probably would look better with McCaffrey.

With that said though, I've seen enough of Bridgewater to conclude that he'd be much better as a backup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • For the silly people that worship her it will be that.  The Coleman 'legend' thing, they did that with another fairly average player that was here and I sort of mocked or questioned the 'legend' status. Instantly caught crap for insulting someone's favorite Panther. So okay, Kurt Coleman is a Legend. 
    • You allow him to compete--you all are talking as if I am proposing making him the starter. Give him a new coach, new weapons, good OL, etc. and see what happens. You are saying, "Well Damn.  It did not work for 3 guys..."  Right now, our C is injured, we lost our top 2 WRs.  Better question:  If you need a QB, Why would you not take a chance on bringing in a QB who was a former first rounder, a good arm, intelligence, mobility, youth, etc.  and see how he does out of NY--with a better OL, better running game, better receivers.  I am not saying give him a 10-year contract, I am saying give him a chance. You act like there is no improvement on offense here--it was a 2 year process, and next year is year 2.  To me, how can you sit there with Bryce and an opportunity to sign a veteran QB on the cheap comes available and you say--"Not us. We're good.  We are waiting for Patrick Mahommes."  Jone's problem is obviously mental--and he has little support.  Why is this so frigging hard to comprehend.  It is called "bottom fishing" and it is better than sitting in the boat.  
    • I think we're going to fall from behind quite early and be forced to abandon the run game.  3 rushes -2 yards 1 catch -10 yards 
×
×
  • Create New...