Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A horrible mistake.


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Just for clarity, Beane was primarily a logistics guy under Hurney. He was in operations, not personnel.

He was given the interim tag by Jerry Richardson after Marty Hurney was let go with the understanding that Ron Rivera had final say on personnel and Beane's primary job was to run the day to day operations and help find the next GM.

(basically, the role Richardson claimed he was giving Marty when he brought him back, but obviously that was a lie).

After he took over the GM job, Dave Gettleman used Beane in the personnel area and ultimately elevated him to assistant GM, going so far as to talk about him being a successor once Gettleman was done.

Best laid plans and all...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/14/2020 at 6:38 PM, LinvilleGorge said:

This is why it is so baffling that JR's puppet is still around. Tepper is supposedly so brilliant and so analytical, yet here we are with Marty Hurney still wearing the GM title when no other team was willing to consider him in anyway after he was fired the first time.

Honestly, having typed that out, I think that might be exactly it. They already have a known willing puppet in place. Maybe this is Rhule's test drive for the control that he wants with Marty acting as a rubber stamp. If it ultimately doesn't work out, Marty falls on the sword again and they see if Rhule will work out with a real GM. I don't know, just spit balling here.

If you can make tons of money win, lose, or draw, maybe some idiots would think it's perfectly fine to surround yourself with those who are loyal and always say yes.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
    • I’m hoping SMU messes it all up and wins out. Imagine the SEC & BI0 would crap themselves trying to “fix” the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...