Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The plan?


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Jeremy Igo said:

Panthers have an easy out with Teddy in 2022. He will only cost 5 million against the cap to release.

Is the plan to draft a QB and use Teddy's second year to let the rookie sit and learn? Teppers is a long term guy and that is definitely a long term plan. 

Would love that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I think the plan was always to use Teddy as a stopgap. That's why we were all over Herbert last draft. 

You don't pay that much for "just" a stopgap, somebody thought he at least had a chance to be more than just a stopgap.  They can justify it, in that its not a long term deal and the overall money isn't crippling, but somebody thought they could win with Teddy.

It was a $40m gamble, so far its looking like it was a mistake.

If we were on pace to be 9-7 and Teddy was playing a little better I'm not 100% sure we draft a QB this year, are you?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jeremy Igo said:

Panthers have an easy out with Teddy in 2022. He will only cost 5 million against the cap to release.

Is the plan to draft a QB and use Teddy's second year to let the rookie sit and learn? Teppers is a long term guy and that is definitely a long term plan. 

As long as its not Hurney.

 

He did draft Cam

With the #1 overall pick.

 

But outside that, he's drafted Grier, Pickles, Tony Pike etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Pup McBarky said:

Teddy is a class guy with a lot to teach a young pro QB. Just because he doesn't have it doesn't mean he can't teach it. In fact, some of the best teachers are mediocre at what they teach. 

I don't get this line of thinking. 

Think about position groups during the weak.  DBs have a secondary coach.  RBs have a running back coach.  

QBs on the other hand, are probably getting input from the HC, the OC, and the QB coach.  Also the QB coach only has 2-3 player to teach.  Whereas most position coaches have more guys.

QBs are the most overcoached players on the field, not sure if you need to spend $40m to add a little bit more coaching.

$40m to spend on the O-line will help a rookie QB a lot more than anything Teddy will teach him.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

I don't get this line of thinking. 

Think about position groups during the weak.  DBs have a secondary coach.  RBs have a running back coach.  

QBs on the other hand, are probably getting input from the HC, the OC, and the QB coach.  Also the QB coach only has 2-3 player to teach.  Whereas most position coaches have more guys.

QBs are the most overcoached players on the field, not sure if you need to spend $40m to add a little bit more coaching.

$40m to spend on the O-line will help a rookie QB a lot more than anything Teddy will teach him.

 

 

Nobody spent $40m just for a coach. They knew he was a consummate pro...he does things the right way. They knew he was familiar with the offense. They thought he would make a good bridge to the next guy. In the meantime, ask any NFL player who they learned to be a pro football player from and it's almost never a coach, it's a fellow player, one that typically plays that same player's position. If it helps, substitute "mentor" for "coach." But it has as much to do with life and being a good teammate than x's and o's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
    • I’m hoping SMU messes it all up and wins out. Imagine the SEC & BI0 would crap themselves trying to “fix” the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...