Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The plan?


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, PhillyB said:

i have a hard time believing we draft a top ten QB and let him sit behind the 4-12 guy

Meh probably end up being something like what happened in Miami. 4-12 guy starts the season, team shows potential, and rookie comes in around week 4 or 5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

This is the worst officiating I've seen since SB50.  They literally let them run an entire play and then said they called a timeout before it after they saw they didn't convert it.  I've never seen such blatant attempts at cheating in my life.  They literally gave them a mulligan.

i somehow doubt the refs are fixing the game for the 4-9 broncos

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Pup McBarky said:

Teddy is a class guy with a lot to teach a young pro QB. Just because he doesn't have it doesn't mean he can't teach it. In fact, some of the best teachers are mediocre at what they teach. 

I don't want him to teach the way of the check down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

Panthers have an easy out with Teddy in 2022. He will only cost 5 million against the cap to release.

Is the plan to draft a QB and use Teddy's second year to let the rookie sit and learn? Teppers is a long term guy and that is definitely a long term plan. 

It 100% should be and is the only good explanation for signing Teddy (still doesn't make it a good signing). I'm a huge fan of letting a rookie QB sit for a year before starting so really hoping this has been the plan all along. And Teddy is one of the QBs I would most want to be mentoring/teaching a young QB. Super high character guy like an Alex Smith who will absolutely do what's best for the team and help the rook learn while knowing he's a lame duck QB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, PhillyB said:

i somehow doubt the refs are fixing the game for the 4-9 broncos

I actually meant that for the GameDay thread lol, but no, I don't think they're fixing the game for them, I just think they generally don't like us, and many officials have a personal affinity for the Broncos for some reason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Mol3m4n said:

I don't want Teddy teaching my rookie qb anything. 

I'm going to disagree. Teddy the p****, but he's a smart p****. Any QB coming out of college needs to learn to take what the defense gives you. Teddy's problem, is that he is too eager to take what the defense gives you instead of nutting up and trying to win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, hepcat said:

If they don’t draft a QB I don’t think Rhule has an excuse to stay past next season. If he has any lick of sense, he will be pounding the table for a rookie QB to buy himself some time.

LOL he’s got a 7 year contract. He ain’t going anywhere anytime soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
    • I’m hoping SMU messes it all up and wins out. Imagine the SEC & BI0 would crap themselves trying to “fix” the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...