Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dave Tepper Deserves This poo for cutting Cam


Chad81

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Chad81 said:

give Cam these wrs we have now and he would be back in 2015 form..

No he wouldn’t, one person is not what wins Super Bowls. You should educate yourself on what does, it just so happens it’s the weakest link for this entire team right now.

I’m sorry the only reason you watched the NFL and Panthers is now gone but it is not a relevant move considering how he is playing this year and would’ve likely not played without ‘commitment’ in his words aka extension.

And again judging by his play an extension for what probably would’ve been longer than TBs two years and more money - it would have been monumentally stupid for this franchise to do that just to make Cam fanboys happy. The QB we wanted got snatched last draft, there was no real choice. But keep telling yourself otherwise to help dry your creepy ass cam fan tears.

And no it’s not everyone’s fault cam is failing....again...for the 10th year in a row. He’s done. Get over it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...