Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If Fox is gone next year Do we keep Davidson?


Snake

Dose Davidson stay or go?  

42 members have voted

  1. 1. Dose Davidson stay or go?

    • Sure lets keep him.
      5
    • NO, we need to start fresh.
      18
    • Depends on the Coach.
      12
    • Destroy all that is Fox. The Dark side must go...
      7


Recommended Posts

Dose everyone like his play calling or do you think we should start out fresh?

When Davidson first arrived, I was really excited b/c of his background with Charlie Weis in NE. He said he wanted to design an offense that, while based on the running game, would be versatile enough to keep us from being so predictable. He wanted to be able to run the ball out of multiple sets and develop the passing game more to keep opposing defense off-guard. Not his exact words, but that was what I took from his first interview after he was hired. However, we all know what has happened under Fox's ultra conservative philosophy and Jake's increasingly declining skills (which were slightly above average to begin with). I suspect these are the real culprits for our offensive woes, since we were dealing with the same thing when Henning was the OC.

With all of that said, I'm a litle undecided. One the one hand, I want to see what Davidson could really do without his playcalling with Fox's influence and a bonafide starting QB; on the other hand, I would't mind bringing in a frest approach to our offensvie scheme. I'm sure this will more than likely be decided if or when a new HC is in place anyway, but that's JMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How much does John Fox have to do with the play calling, offensive or defensive? Does Davidson and/or Meeks give Fox a few plays that he thinks would be good for the situation the team is in, and Fox chooses out of those? Or is it all Davidson? All Meeks? These questions weigh in heavily on my answer to the thread...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bryce put it in a spot only his guy could get it only for David Moore to drop it. T_T Tremble and Horn both struggled yesterday and that killed me since they're two of my favourite players. Tommy knows he has to come down with this one. Folks were understandably saying that JT would've caught that had he not gotten hurt a few plays earlier. The more I look at this play, the more I think that Bryce made the right decision throwing it out the back of the endzone. He could have tried to laser it in to Thielen, but that safety is lurking awfully close inside. Insuring the field goal here after a 44sec drive to end the half was the right move.
    • Except Bryce was the main reason we were in it 
    • NFL Pro has the All-22 up already 😄 Going to grab a play or two from each redzone series to put screenshots to. Looks like AT angled his route off to the near pylon rather than the back corner where Bryce was throwing to. I imagine this is something they'll quickly try to figure out with Thielen back from IR. After watching the All-22 again, this was actually a pretty nifty play. I thought it was a TE screen to Tremble because of the way XL charged the DB, but he quickly shed and kept upfield as seen in the second screenshot. This looks like it had multiple layers built into it with AT running the crosser, XL the fade, Tremble to the flat. The progression would call for the play to go to Chuba here as the LB does follow Tremble out into the flat. Ball hits Chuba low and in the hands, but the LB does a good job disrupting the catch.
×
×
  • Create New...