Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Panthers at Vikings Gameday Thread


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Maybe if we were still talking about Ron Rivera, I could listen to that. Matt Rhule doesn't fit that profile at all.

He's had absolutely no issue with benching Greg Little and one of his own Temple guys in Tahir Whitehead.

I'm just saying Scot...  Teddy is the coaches' guy - primarily Brady's.  There was no link to Hurney, so the decision is theirs, and there is a big difference between benching Whitehead and Little and a guy you paid more money to so you could cut Cam Newton, only for him to be a game manager.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tinamedina said:

Exactly. No way Rhule chose Teddy...with the way his coaching style is...naw. this is a BAD decision, marty is known for those.

If you don't think that the Draft and FA was all Rhule then you've not been paying attention.

It was nothing like a Hurney offseason. 

Brady chose Bridgewater. Rhule green lit it (after Bill Parcells told him that if he ever got to the NFL he should go after Bridgewater).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Proudiddy said:

I'm just saying Scot...  Teddy is the coaches' guy - primarily Brady's.  There was no link to Hurney, so the decision is theirs, and there is a big difference between benching Whitehead and Little and a guy you paid more money to so you could cut Cam Newton, only for him to be a game manager.

I mean, PJ Walker sucks.  Let's be real.  Teddy is definitely the better QB.

But I'm 99.9% sure the coaching staff doesn't see Teddy as a franchise, long-term guy. He's a stopgap, hence his contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Teddy 2/8.  And look at how PJ placed the ball on throws where it allowed the receiver to catch it and remain in stride.  The majority of Teddy's throws are either stopping/slowing the receiver or to a receiver who has stopped and then has to create on his own.  That is the biggest difference when Teddy is in the game.  The onus is on the receiver to make the play bc the QB doesn't.

Somebody knows football! #pjwalker2021

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...