Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Oh Crap! Get Ready to watch out game Sunday on Mute.


Chad81

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, DJ feed me moore said:

so off the top of my head fox has aikmen, vilma, aquib talib, and ronde barber.... yeah I'm ready for Olsen to retire.

it never happen but Greg over aikman would be like romo replacing simms.it would be a major upgrade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DJ feed me moore said:

so off the top of my head fox has aikmen, vilma, aquib talib, and ronde barber.... yeah I'm ready for Olsen to retire.

Compared to the rest of those Aikmen is night and day better, though I haven't heard Talib yet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aikman man can be monotone and mundane but at least he is insightful and has substance unlike the rest. Colinsworth has great stories but he really has nothing else to add to the games and his voice makes me cringe. Romo and Aikman are the best hands down, it’s hard listening to anyone else. 

As far as the rest, they could really find better prospects IMO. Vilma is complete trash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Chad81 said:

Saints Clown Jonathan Vilma is calling our game.

Last time this clown called our game aginst the bears you could tell he was rooting aginst us and I had to mute the tv same will be done on sunday.

 

I remember that...one of the worse announced games I ever listened too.  I wish there was a link to send in complaints which I'm pretty sure there will be many.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...