Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Panthers - Lions Gameday Thread


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Just now, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

Bang for the $ we are 3-7 without those cap hits we probably still are 3-7... 

.....

Yep and none of them were for the future. This season should have been about saving cap and seeing what we had for the future. Could have had a 3rd, $90M in cap space and seen PJ all year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SOJA said:

This is probably the biggest game det has had in the Patricia era and this is how they look

I feel bad for their fans

I've got a good friend who is a Lions fan, and I told them that unless our backup QB got to play was much better than Teddy (I anticipated PJ playing better, I just figured they wouldn't give him the chance), they would have an easy win and could deactivate their punter lol.  Well, at least now we know what our divisional opponents feel like in important games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, onmyown said:

Typical knee jerk reaction...against the almighty #30 ranked defense in the nfl (the worst we’ve played this year)? Prolly give him more time than 10 minutes in a game to declare this I mean I understand the the bias of TB due to Cam but seriously let’s be objective here.

Not saying he's the answer, but PJ has made multiple throws this game that Teddy has never made the whole season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Proudiddy said:

I've got a good friend who is a Lions fan, and I told them that unless our backup QB got to play was much better than Teddy (I anticipated PJ playing better, I just figured they wouldn't give him the chance), they would have an easy win and could deactivate their punter lol.  Well, at least now we know what our divisional opponents feel like in important games.

prayers to ure friend 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, top dawg said:

It's early, but I'm going out on a limb and say all you guys routing for us to lose are going to be disappointed today!

I’m actually OK with that because we are seeing future potential. Teddy wasn’t future potential. Whitehead wasn’t.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stbugs said:

We can cut bait after this year and save $10M next year. I know PJ is early but one drive is all it took to see that we wasted $70M plus on Teddy, Short and Okung. We could have extended Samuel and Short for 4 years instead. SMH. 

Taylor Heinecke opened his first start with two or three good drives.

I'm never a fan of making conclusions based on a small sample. Always play the long game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...