Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Panthers - Lions Gameday Thread


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

No it won't. We can easily cut bait after next season.

 

We can cut bait after this year and save $10M next year. I know PJ is early but one drive is all it took to see that we wasted $70M plus on Teddy, Short and Okung. We could have extended Samuel and Short for 4 years instead. SMH. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jeremy Igo said:

Yeah, I'm angry that a Panthers qb looks good 

You used to be a quality poster here. Now you are garbage. Weird.

 

I noticed that too with the other thread...

Dood it would be HUGE AF if we have an XFL guy who can play QB and actually be good. We can get DE/LT and have TB as a backup that's a legit team if PJ turns out to be good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, stbugs said:

We can cut bait after this year and save $10M next year. I know PJ is early but one drive is all it took to see that we wasted $70M plus on Teddy, Short and Okung. We could have extended Samuel and Short for 4 years instead. SMH. 

Bang for the $ we are 3-7 without those cap hits we probably still are 3-7... 

.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

KK, Shaq's contract, and 24M to Bridgewater when PJ could've been doing this the whole time...  yup.  Bad business.

Typical knee jerk reaction...against the almighty #30 ranked defense in the nfl (the worst we’ve played this year)? Prolly give him more time than 10 minutes in a game to declare this I mean I understand the the bias of TB due to Cam but seriously let’s be objective here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, onmyown said:

Only thing I’m worried about is motivation. He has been called out twice for being lazy/effort and his play afterwards is night and day. That’s a problem...especially when he gets paid.  But agree he should be resigned with caution. 

Never saw anything like that from DJ. Sounds like made up bullshit that started from those afraid to face the fact that Teddy isn't the answer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...