Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

QB Conundrum


WarHeel

Recommended Posts

and we have too many holes to trade up for a qb this year.  if one is there we like, great.  if not maybe we'll be in a position to trade up the following year if we need to.  there is no need at all to bring in a guy unless we've improved the oline, or focus on it simultaneously.  you people who constantly say teddy sucks blah blah blah, what are your solutions that are actually possible?   we're not in a position for a rookie to flourish yet.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did bash the management for signing him. Was a huge mistake. And now that we’re feeling the effects of that mistake, I still say it was a horrible decision.  The coaching has been good though.  They’re two separate aspects to judge. I just hope they don’t repeat the same mistake next year by not trying to replace him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

I did bash the management for signing him. Was a huge mistake. And now that we’re feeling the effects of that mistake, I still say it was a horrible decision.  The coaching has been good though.  They’re two separate aspects to judge. I just hope they don’t repeat the same mistake next year by not trying to replace him

yeah but the way we do that is trading back in the draft and getting a little capital to spend.  right now we don't have any.   we have too many holes to trade up.  if a guy falls in our lap great, if not oh well.  the other way we do it is to actually develop talent and then trade it for a higher pick than we spent because we've got lots of really good players.  we're not there yet either.  look at deshaun.  he was on track to consistently be a top 5 elite level qb.  that situation has been mismanaged so badly.  i don't want to be the texans and i don't want to be the previous regime that never got cam a good line.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh look, it's this thread again!

Teddy is a game manager, the same thing he was when we signed him. He's also probably the best game managing QB in the NFL. Teddy is good enough for us to win. Teddy isn't good enough to carry the team on his back when we need a victory.

Teddy isn't the biggest problem on this team, not by a wide margin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Oh look, it's this thread again!

Teddy is a game manager, the same thing he was when we signed him. He's also probably the best game managing QB in the NFL. Teddy is good enough for us to win. Teddy isn't good enough to carry the team on his back when we need a victory.

Teddy isn't the biggest problem on this team, not by a wide margin.

are you saying its a possible issue that we don't make other teams punt for half a season?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, raz said:

are you saying its a possible issue that we don't make other teams punt for half a season?

Yeah, weird how that works, right? How many teams in the NFL have to overcome the kind of offensive output we allow and are also successful? Just Seattle. And they happen to have arguably the best QB in the NFL currently who has largely played at an MVP level.

That's what it takes to make up for the kind of defense we have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, weird how that works, right? How many teams in the NFL have to overcome the kind of offensive output we allow and are also successful? Just Seattle. And they happen to have arguably the best QB in the NFL currently who has largely played at an MVP level.

That's what it takes to make up for the kind of defense we have.

While I understand that the defense is bad after they were historically bad last year, how do we defend scoring less points through 10 games of Teddy than we did with Kyle Allen? How do we defense 30something yards of offense in the second quarter followed by 30 yards of offense the second half? How do we defend the awful interception Teddy threw? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Varking said:

While I understand that the defense is bad after they were historically bad last year, how do we defend scoring less points through 10 games of Teddy than we did with Kyle Allen? How do we defense 30something yards of offense in the second quarter followed by 30 yards of offense the second half? How do we defend the awful interception Teddy threw? 

it seem like you keep propping up an argument nobody is making but you.  nobody is defending teddy.  some are saying he could win us some games if the rest of the team was nfl level, but that's it.   there's you and one or two others who have an imaginary antagonist you're railing against, and its weird that the antagonist is coming from your imagination

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, weird how that works, right? How many teams in the NFL have to overcome the kind of offensive output we allow and are also successful? Just Seattle. And they happen to have arguably the best QB in the NFL currently who has largely played at an MVP level.

That's what it takes to make up for the kind of defense we have.

its not even working out for russell right now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Varking said:

While I understand that the defense is bad after they were historically bad last year, how do we defend scoring less points through 10 games of Teddy than we did with Kyle Allen? How do we defense 30something yards of offense in the second quarter followed by 30 yards of offense the second half? How do we defend the awful interception Teddy threw? 

Well the offense is statistically better than it was last year, so consider that. The defense is also statistically better. Not by much on either account.

The awful interception had no bearing on the outcome of the game, we were long since out of it at that point. We ran out to a lead and then they adjusted and took away every weapon we had, because unlike us, they actually DO have a good defense. Teddy isn't Wilson, Mahomes, Aaron Rodgers, etc. He can't claw his way out of the kind of holes that our defense consistently puts us in. He goes in, runs the offense, takes what they give him and largely does a pretty good job at it. 

He isn't going to be Kyle Murray out there scrambling from one end of the field to the other to buy time for his guys to get open. People irrationally get upset at Teddy for being something he is not. Teddy Bridgewater could probably be close to undefeated this season, much like he was last season if he had the type of team talent New Orleans does. Well we don't have that talent. 

Teddy has outright lost us or played a significant hand in losing us 2-3 games this season. This wasn't one of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...