Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Bucs at Panthers Gameday Thread


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, PhillyB said:

it really is a befuddling paradox though. like he's still got serious flaws and the criticisms of him have tons of merit but god damn he's 10/2TDs halfway through the first quarter lmao

Yea like the team in general....a little more talent and we're going to be sick. CB, OL, QB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, raleigh-panther said:

He can’t. It was under thrown.  We scored and I’m happy but a QB1 with a better arm and that strike goes for six 

not trying to upset anybody with that 

Maybe a QB one doesn't even see him. Maybe a QB one has more interceptions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PhillyB said:

it really is a befuddling paradox though. like he's still got serious flaws and the criticisms of him have tons of merit but god damn he's 10/2TDs halfway through the first quarter lmao

He's not a bad QB.  Plays great in the system.  I don't think it's that confusing or anything.  He's just not someone that is going to make something great that isn't, you know?  Very good system and very good supporting players.  He's great in that situation.  Just not a long-term, game-changing franchise QB.

And that's okay.  We didn't bring him in to be a 10-year starter.  His goal is to help implement the system and make us competitive... which is what he's done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Teddy is a capable QB

Teddy is a limited QB

 

Both of these statements can be true. And that's what all the "people hating on Teddy" have been screaming since Day 1. He's "perfect", with one underthrown deep ball, a joke of a TD pass that was almost broken up, and some check downs.  I'd pray to God we have a QB who could go 8/8 checking it down Sam Bradford style in the flats and 2 yards down field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...