Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why is everyone so hard on Teddy?


Dragoon11

Recommended Posts

You know, I understand we are losing a lot of close games, but lets be realistic... these are probably games that most people though we wouldn't have even been in this year.  The fact that Teddy Bridgewater is helping make these games close is promising.  The defense needs a more consistent pass rush, and has to force more turnovers. The O-line needs to get better as well.

I know it is a "win now" league, but we all know that's crap... Before Cam had his big season in 2015 they were losing a lot of close games, then they figured out how to win. Let the season play out, then see where we are... This team has TONS of upside and potential. I think Teddy is good enough to get this team to a SB... Just not this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's paid 24M a year to be a franchise QB, and he has yet to play like one when it mattered.  Again, great guy, and yes, he is playing behind an absolute poo OL,  but you pay a guy that much money to win you games with big-time plays, not manage them.  I give it to him though, that 4th and 14 scramble today was the type of stuff we've needed from him.  But, still, his decision-making in clutch situations has been really bad for the most part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, hepcat said:

We’re hard on him because the team would be 9-0 right now if Teddy was clutch 

We could be 9-0 if the secondary and oline wasn’t trash. 
 

why bring in a new QB when the obvious fundamentals are the worst in the league?

one step before the next, TB is hurt whether you believe it or not and Cam was ruined for the same mistakes

pretty clear QB is not step 1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because he doesn't have "it" and with him on the roster the team will probably not invest a first round pick at the QB position.

So we are either stuck with him or trying to coach up a lower prospect. In both scenarios we will probably end up at being a team that can win a occasional playoff game but not much more than that.

To win the super bowl most often the QB need to have one game during the playoff run were he puts the team on his shoulder and carry the team. Can Teddy do that? Probably not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

We have to deprogram people who think that Teddy is a franchise QB. Thats why we go hard in the paint. As soon as everyone realizes that Teddy is a stopgap, and takes the L, we will stop.

Originally this is why I spoke up and got pood like crazy. People here after three games declared him a franchise QB and some literally called him ELITE. He isn’t. He’s not horrible but he isn’t a franchise QB and he for sure is not elite. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because he’s not that good. He’s ok, but we were accustomed to 7.5 years of great QB play, then 1.5 of injury riddled bad QB play which is easier to stomach because there’s hope, to now we have what we have.  Mediocre QB play. It’s tough to have such a drastic downgrade when it’s not a Colts situation with Manning to that guy before Luck where you know you have a chance at a good QB in the near future.  We’re in QB purgatory. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, kass said:

Because he doesn't have "it" and with him on the roster the team will probably not invest a first round pick at the QB position.

So we are either stuck with him or trying to coach up a lower prospect. In both scenarios we will probably end up at being a team that can win a occasional playoff game but not much more than that.

To win the super bowl most often the QB need to have one game during the playoff run were he puts the team on his shoulder and carry the team. Can Teddy do that? Probably not.

I guess time will truly tell, but for sure he deserves a little... I like how people think that we can just go down to our local Walmart and pick a Tom Brady off the shelf on an isle that is FULL of "franchise" QB's. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Because he’s not that good. He’s ok, but we were accustomed to .5 years of great QB play, then 1.5 of injury riddled bad QB play which is easier to stomach because there’s hope, to now we have what we have.  Mediocre QB play. It’s tough to have such a drastic downgrade when it’s not a Colts situation with Manning to that guy before Luck where you know you have a chance at a good QB in the near future.  We’re in QB purgatory. 

FIFY

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
    • Not a chance the SEC could compete with the NFL.  In the large cities that are not in the Southeast, (LA, NYC, Chicago, SF) College football is an afterthought.  
×
×
  • Create New...