Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Falcons at Panthers Gameday Thread - Part Deux - The Reckoning


Zod

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Proudiddy said:

See, like that...  I just don't understand what Brady is doing there.  The draw and then that????  Embarrassing.

I actually can kind of understand the draw since he was hoping they wouldn't see it coming after the loss of yardage, I don't agree with it but I can at least see the logic. That last play was just flat out bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Proudiddy said:

I hope not.  I was assuming that was motion by design to bring Davis back, but, now that you mention it, it looks like he may have audibled him into the backfield to help once he saw the blitz...  too bad Paradis and Davis didnt.

It looked to me like he knew it was coming and he did some checks at the line. I’m not 100% sure. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CPF4LIFE said:

Shouldnt have ran that weak ass draw on the second down. Brady just brain farts at the worst times. 

I was saying the same thing.  Atrocious series right there...  but if Reed and Paradis are halfway decent, it prolly looks a lot different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Proudiddy said:

I hope not.  I was assuming that was motion by design to bring Davis back, but, now that you mention it, it looks like he may have audibled him into the backfield to help once he saw the blitz...  too bad Paradis and Davis didnt.

he very clearly brought Davis in to pick up the block.

if the pressure up the middle had been picked up maybe he coulda stopped up instead of back

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...